Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32437292›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2020

Engage for Equity: Development of Community-Based Participatory Research Tools.

Myra Parker, Nina Wallerstein, Bonnie Duran, Maya Magarati, Ellen Burgess, Shannon Sanchez-Youngman, Blake Boursaw, Amanda Heffernan, Justin Garoutte, Paul Koegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Identifying Common Patient-Oriented Priorities for Child and Adolescent Health Research and Care: A Systematic Review of Priority Setting Partnerships.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Myra ParkerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4871-4304
Nina WallersteinUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1969-0799
Bonnie DuranUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Maya MagaratiUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ellen BurgessUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Shannon Sanchez-YoungmanUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Blake BoursawUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Amanda HeffernanUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Justin GaroutteUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1136-577X
Paul KoegelRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Funding

Enhancing CBPR Practice through Provision of Expert Information SkillsR01NR015241 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI WALLERSTEIN, NINA B · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a set of four community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnership tools aimed at supporting community-academic research partnerships in strengthening their research processes, with the ultimate goal of improving research outcomes. The aim of this article is to describe the tools we developed to accomplish this goal: (1) the River of Life Exercise; (2) a Partnership Visioning Exercise; (3) a personalized Partnership Data Report of data from academic and community research partners; and (4) a Promising Practices Guide with aggregated survey data analyses on promising CBPR practices associated with CBPR and health outcomes from two national samples of CBPR projects that completed a series of two online surveys. Relying on Paulo Freire's philosophy of praxis, or the cycles of collective reflection and action, we developed a set of tools designed to support research teams in holding discussions aimed at strengthening research partnership capacity, aligning research partnership efforts to achieve grant aims, and recalling and operationalizing larger social justice goals. This article describes the theoretical framework and process for tool development and provides preliminary data from small teams representing 25 partnerships who attended face-to-face workshops and provided their perceptions of tool accessibility and intended future use.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsExerciseHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCBPR tools/toolkitcommunity–academic research partnershipscommunity-based participatory researchcommunity-engaged researchpublic health

Identifiers

PMID32437292
PMCPMC10792999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.