ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2020
Comparison of pleural and esophageal pressure in supine and prone positions in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Esophageal pressures in supine and prone position: evaluation using high-resolution manometry.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Impact of Baydur ratio correction on the reliability of esophageal pressure measurement.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026Article
- Awake Prone Positioning in Non-Intubated Non-COVID-19 ARDS: A Comprehensive Review.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Review
- Positive end-expiratory pressure increases intracranial pressure but does not affect PRx, regardless of body position, in a porcine ARDS model.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Prone positioning.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Mechanical power normalized to aerated lung predicts noninvasive ventilation failure and death and contributes to the benefits of proning in COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure.The EPMA journal · 2023Article
- Understanding clinical and biological heterogeneity to advance precision medicine in paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2023Review
- Oesophageal pressure as a surrogate of pleural pressure in mechanically ventilated patients.ERJ open research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) benefit from prone positioning. Although the accuracy of esophageal pressure (Pes) to estimate regional pleural pressure (Ppl) has previously been assessed in the supine position, such data are not available in the prone position in ARDS. In six anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated female pigs, we measured Pes and Ppl into dorsal and ventral parts of the right pleural cavity. Airway pressure (Paw) and flow were measured at the airway opening. Severe ARDS [arterial partial pressure of oxygen ([Formula: see text])/fraction of inspired oxygen ([Formula: see text]) < 100 mmHg at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.