Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32437234›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2020

Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) Psychology: Measuring and Mapping Scales of Cultural and Psychological Distance.

Michael Muthukrishna, Adrian V Bell, Joseph Henrich, Cameron M Curtin, Alexander Gedranovich, Jason McInerney, Braden Thue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Developmental Screening Tools Used with First Nations Populations: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Educating minds with generative AI.Communications psychology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. WEIRD but Also Inconsistent: An Analysis of the Reporting Practices of Participant Samples Across Five Areas of Psychology.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026
    Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael MuthukrishnaDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science.ORCID 0000-0002-7079-5166
Adrian V BellDepartment of Anthropology, The University of Utah.
Joseph HenrichDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University.
Cameron M CurtinDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University.
Alexander GedranovichDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Jason McInerneyDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University.
Braden ThueDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we present a tool and a method for measuring the psychological and cultural distance between societies and creating a distance scale with any population as the point of comparison. Because psychological data are dominated by samples drawn from Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) nations, and overwhelmingly, the United States, we focused on distance from the United States. We also present distance from China, the country with the largest population and second largest economy, which is a common cultural comparison. We applied the fixation index (

Indexed as

CognitionCross-Cultural ComparisonCultural DiversityPsychological DistanceChinaDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesHumansPsychoanalytic InterpretationPsychology, SocialResearch DesignUnited Statescross-cultural differencescultural distancecultural psychologyreplication crisisWEIRD people

Identifiers

PMID32437234
PMCPMC7357184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.