Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32437194›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychology2020

Working memory and short-term memory deficits in ADHD: A bifactor modeling approach.

Michael J Kofler, Leah J Singh, Elia F Soto, Elizabeth S M Chan, Caroline E Miller, Sherelle L Harmon, Jamie A Spiegel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The role of single trial variability in event related potentials in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Clinical predictors of stimulant efficacy in adults with ADHD.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J KoflerDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.ORCID 0000-0002-8604-3647
Leah J SinghDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Elia F SotoDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.ORCID 0000-0002-6672-287X
Elizabeth S M ChanDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Caroline E MillerDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Sherelle L HarmonDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University.ORCID 0000-0002-7727-6908
Jamie A SpiegelDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.ORCID 0000-0002-5928-9924
Florida State University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Evaluating the Efficacy of Central Executive Training (CET) for ADHDR01MH115048 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KOFLER, MICHAEL J · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Evaluating the Feasibility of Central Executive Training for Children with ADHD- Administrative SupplementR34MH102499 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KOFLER, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2016
$737k
NIHNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115048NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH102499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermModels, PsychologicalAdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersNeuropsychological TestsParentsSchool TeachersSpatial Memory

Identifiers

PMID32437194
PMCPMC7483636
OpenAlexW3026841723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.