ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2020
Individualized Absorption Models in Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics analysis confirming biosimilarity of SB16 to reference denosumab.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Model based assessment of food and acid reducing agent effects on oral absorption of mezigdomide (CC-92480), a novel cereblon E3 ligase modulator.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023Article
- A framework for precision "dosing" of mental healthcare services: algorithm development and clinical pilot.International journal of mental health systems · 2023Article
- Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of the Complex Release Kinetics of Octreotide LAR: Defining Sub-Populations by Cluster Analysis.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Application of Deep Neural Networks as a Prescreening Tool to Assign Individualized Absorption Models in Pharmacokinetic Analysis.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.