Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32436942›Full record

ArticleSleep2020

Deep learning enables sleep staging from photoplethysmogram for patients with suspected sleep apnea.

Henri Korkalainen, Juhani Aakko, Brett Duce, Samu Kainulainen, Akseli Leino, Sami Nikkonen, Isaac O Afara, Sami Myllymaa, Juha Töyräs, Timo Leppänen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Respiratory event index underestimates severity of sleep apnea compared to apnea-hypopnea index.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.Physiological measurement · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Henri KorkalainenDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Juhani AakkoCGI Suomi Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
Brett DuceDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Sleep Disorders Centre, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Samu KainulainenDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Akseli LeinoDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Sami NikkonenDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Isaac O AfaraDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Sami MyllymaaDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Juha TöyräsDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Timo LeppänenDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FIQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesAccurate identification of sleep stages is essential in the diagnosis of sleep disorders (e.g. obstructive sleep apnea [OSA]) but relies on labor-intensive electroencephalogram (EEG)-based manual scoring. Furthermore, long-term assessment of sleep relies on actigraphy differentiating only between wake and sleep periods without identifying specific sleep stages and having low reliability in identifying wake periods after sleep onset. To address these issues, we aimed to develop an automatic method for identifying the sleep stages from the photoplethysmogram (PPG) signal obtained with a simple finger pulse oximeter.

methodsPPG signals from the diagnostic polysomnographies of susptected OSA patients (n = 894) were utilized to develop a combined convolutional and recurrent neural network. The deep learning model was trained individually for three-stage (wake/NREM/REM), four-stage (wake/N1+N2/N3/REM), and five-stage (wake/N1/N2/N3/REM) classification of sleep.

resultsThe three-stage model achieved an epoch-by-epoch accuracy of 80.1% with Cohen's κ of 0.65. The four- and five-stage models achieved 68.5% (κ = 0.54), and 64.1% (κ = 0.51) accuracies, respectively. With the five-stage model, the total sleep time was underestimated with a mean bias error (SD) of of 7.5 (55.2) minutes.

conclusionThe PPG-based deep learning model enabled accurate estimation of sleep time and differentiation between sleep stages with a moderate agreement to manual EEG-based scoring. As PPG is already included in ambulatory polygraphic recordings, applying the PPG-based sleep staging could improve their diagnostic value by enabling simple, low-cost, and reliable monitoring of sleep and help assess otherwise overlooked conditions such as REM-related OSA.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSleep Apnea SyndromesHumansPhotoplethysmographyReproducibility of ResultsSleepSleep Stagesdeep learningobstructive sleep apneaphotoplethysmogramrecurrent neural networkssleep staging

Identifiers

PMID32436942
PMCPMC7658638
OpenAlexW3026720205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.