Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32436845›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2020

A review on the use of artificial intelligence for medical imaging of the lungs of patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Rintaro Ito, Shingo Iwano, Shinji Naganawa

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. COVID-19 pneumonia: lessons learned, challenges, and preparing for the future.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A comprehensive review on efficient approaches for combating coronaviruses.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Imaging of COVID-19: An update of current evidences.Diagnostic and interventional imaging · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Role of Medical Imaging in COVID-19.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Role of Chest CT in COVID-19.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rintaro ItoDepartment of Innovative Biomedical Visualization, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Shingo IwanoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Shinji NaganawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The results of research on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for medical imaging of the lungs of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been published in various forms. In this study, we reviewed the AI for diagnostic imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia. PubMed, arXiv, medRxiv, and Google scholar were used to search for AI studies. There were 15 studies of COVID-19 that used AI for medical imaging. Of these, 11 studies used AI for computed tomography (CT) and 4 used AI for chest radiography. Eight studies presented independent test data, 5 used disclosed data, and 4 disclosed the AI source codes. The number of datasets ranged from 106 to 5941, with sensitivities ranging from 0.67-1.00 and specificities ranging from 0.81-1.00 for prediction of COVID-19 pneumonia. Four studies with independent test datasets showed a breakdown of the data ratio and reported prediction of COVID-19 pneumonia with sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). These 4 studies showed very high sensitivity, specificity, and AUC, in the range of 0.9-0.98, 0.91-0.96, and 0.96-0.99, respectively.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLungPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID32436845
PMCPMC7490030
OpenAlexW3026350508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.