Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32436686›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2020

Improved precision of radiographic measurements for distal radius fractures after a technique-teaching tutorial.

Shandy Fox, Geoffrey Johnston, Samuel Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shandy FoxFrom the Winnipeg Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. (Fox); RebalanceMD, Victoria, B.C. (Johnston); and the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Stewart).
Geoffrey JohnstonFrom the Winnipeg Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. (Fox); RebalanceMD, Victoria, B.C. (Johnston); and the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Stewart).
Samuel StewartFrom the Winnipeg Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. (Fox); RebalanceMD, Victoria, B.C. (Johnston); and the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Stewart).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For the management of distal radius fractures, surgical decision-making depends on radiographic measurements of indicators including radial inclination (RI), ulnar variance (UV) and radial tilt (RT). Evaluation of the inter- and intrarater reliability of surgeons' measurements of these criteria has been limited. Methods: Twelve physicians were invited to participate in this study. Anonymously, they measured RI, UV and RT on 30 digitally stored radiographs of distal radius fractures on 3 occasions, each at least 1 week apart, using online measuring tools. After taking the third set of measurements, the participants were given a tutorial by the senior author (G.J.) on a single technique to measure all 3 indicators. The participants then took 3 more sets of measurements using only the technique they had been taught. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate interrater reliability each week. Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate the effect of the tutorial, controlling for week of study along with reader (participant) and patient variance. Results: The ICCs indicated that the participants' measurement precision improved promptly after the tutorial, and this improvement was sustained through subsequent readings. The odds of an "accurate" measurement (within 2° of the senior author's measurements for RI, 1 mm for UV and 4° for RT) was 1.7 times higher for RI, 2.7 times higher for UV and 2.3 times higher for RT after the tutorial; all of these results were statistically significant. Conclusion: Surgeons ought to be familiar with a method to reproducibly measure the indicators used in the published guidelines for surgical intervention. The tutorial on a single standardized technique for online measurement of RI, UV and RT in distal radius fractures improved measurement precision.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingAdultEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleFracture FixationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedicsRadiographyRadiusRadius FracturesReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID32436686
PMCPMC7828995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.