Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32436641›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2020

Ultra rapid lispro lowers postprandial glucose and more closely matches normal physiological glucose response compared to other rapid insulin analogues: A phase 1 randomized, crossover study.

Tim Heise, Helle Linnebjerg, David Coutant, Elizabeth LaBell, Eric Zijlstra, Christoph Kapitza, Juliana Bue-Valleskey, Qianyi Zhang, Mary Anne Dellva, Jennifer Leohr

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Therapy-Related Satisfaction and Quality of Life for Japanese People with Diabetes Using Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs: A Web-Based Survey.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tim HeiseProfil, Neuss, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8346-2037
Helle LinnebjergEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5849-921X
David CoutantEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Elizabeth LaBellEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Eric ZijlstraProfil, Neuss, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8843-5452
Christoph KapitzaProfil, Neuss, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9700-2373
Juliana Bue-ValleskeyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9746-7744
Qianyi ZhangEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Mary Anne DellvaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Jennifer LeohrEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5434-7905
Eli Lilly (United States) · USProfil Institute for Metabolic Research · DE

Funding

This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and glucodynamic (GD) characteristics of ultra rapid lispro (URLi; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana), Fiasp® (Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), Humalog® (Eli Lilly and Company) and NovoRapid® (Novo Nordisk), in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, four-period, crossover study, conducted in 68 patients with T1D. Patients received the same individualized subcutaneous dose of each study drug immediately prior to a liquid test meal. For comparison, 12 healthy subjects received the same test meal.

resultsURLi had a significantly faster insulin absorption compared to the other insulins tested. Early half-maximal drug concentration was reached 13 minutes after administration of URLi, which was 6 minutes faster than Fiasp, 13 minutes faster than Humalog, and 14 minutes faster than NovoRapid (all P <0.0001). Early insulin exposure was significantly greater and late insulin exposure was reduced after URLi compared to the other insulins. URLi achieved the greatest numerical reduction in postprandial glucose (PPG) at 2 hours post-meal (7 mg/dL vs Fiasp) and was significantly different from Humalog (21 mg/dL) and Novo Rapid (29 mg/dL). Additionally, glucose excursions over the first 3 hours post-meal with URLi were comparable to those in healthy subjects.

conclusionsURLi demonstrated the fastest insulin absorption and the greatest numeric PPG-lowering effect compared to the other insulins tested. URLi more closely matched the early physiological glucose control observed in healthy subjects.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1GlucoseBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin LisproBlood GlucoseGlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Lisproglycaemic controlinsulin analoguespharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsrandomized trialtype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32436641
PMCPMC7540588
OpenAlexW3026523296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.