Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32436165›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2021

Introducing ORTO-R: a revision of ORTO-15 : Based on the re-assessment of original data.

Radosław Rogoza, Lorenzo M Donini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review on the Prevalence and Risk of Orthorexia Nervosa in Health Workers and Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Radosław RogozaInstitute of Psychology, Community-Based Mental Health Center for Children and Adolescent: Warsaw-Bielany District, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938, Warsaw, Poland. r.rogoza@uksw.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4983-9320
Lorenzo M DoniniSapienza University in Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

Ministry of Investment and Development WND-POWR.04.01.00-00-D208/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrthorexia nervosa has attracted significant attention in the field, however, alongside increasing knowledge, more and more gaps are being identified. One of the fundamental problems concerns measurement of orthorexia nervosa. The most commonly used self-report measure, the ORTO-15, demonstrated an unstable factorial structure across different populations. Therefore, one might question whether the knowledge obtained from past research using ORTO-15 is valid or not. The aim of the present paper is to re-analyse original data used for the validation of ORTO-15 to assess its factorial structure and propose its revision, the ORTO-R.

methodsThe description of the sample and procedure corresponds to the one reported in Donini et al. (Eat Weight Disord 10:28-32, 2005). N = 525 subjects were enrolled. To evaluate whether the factorial structure of ORTO-15, we used confirmatory factor analysis. The results revealed that the ORTO-15 indeed does not capture the structure of orthorexia nervosa adequately and revision is needed. The ORTO-R contains six items from ORTO-15, which were identified as the best markers of orthorexia nervosa. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionIn the current paper, we present a refined measure of orthorexia nervosa-the ORTO-R. It is based on a frequently used ORTO-15, overcoming its main limitations. We strongly believe that the current work will act as a bridge, linking past with the future research, and that alongside a new measure, the field of research on orthorexia nervosa will move forward. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, descriptive study.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersFeeding BehaviorFactor Analysis, StatisticalHealth BehaviorHumansSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesMeasurementOrthorexia nervosaORTO-15ORTO-R

Identifiers

PMID32436165
PMCPMC8004519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.