ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2020
Does the single-item self-rated health measure the same thing across different wordings? Construct validity study.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of youths as change agents on self-rated health status and happiness among adult neighbors: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Sri Lanka.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Preventing Weight Regain After Glucagon-Like Peptide‑1 Therapy Discontinuation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
- Role Overload and Health Among Family Caregivers of Older Persons in the United States: Does Religious Attendance Matter?Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Which aspects of continuity of care in primary care are associated with better self-rated health? A cross-sectional study among older adults in Berlin.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- How does social capital shape trajectories of adolescent self-rated health in the United Kingdom?Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026Article
- Association Between Self-Rated Health and eHealth Literacy in Higher Vocational Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2026Observational
- Do young people who have been treated for cancer identify as 'survivors'? Adolescents and young adults' preferences for cancer-related identities in survivorship.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Why Most Australians Consider It Valuable to Find Harmless Abnormalities with Diagnostic Tests: A Mixed-Methods Study.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026Article
- Self-Perceived Health, Comorbidity, and Burden Among Older Family Caregivers of Seniors with Severe Mental Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Self-care practices among nurses at an academic institution in a conflict zone: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Social inequalities in self-rated health in Sweden using the Population Health Performance Index: a cross-sectional study.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Social Determinant Correlates of Self-Rated Health Among Newly Resettled Afghan Refugees in Oklahoma City.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- Explaining Physical Activity and Self-Rated Health Through Motivation and Perceived Service Quality: A Structural Equation Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting the Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence for Health Information: Comparative Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Loneliness as a predictor of self-rated health: a gendered, cross-national analysis in six European countries.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- Transgender people experience more discrimination and violence than cisgender lesbian, gay, or bisexual people: A multilevel analysis across 30 European countries.International journal of transgender health · 2026Article
- Single-item measures in digital mental healthcare: a mini narrative review of challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Measuring professional identity in health and social care students: single-item question versus the Macleod Clark Professional Identity Scale (MCPIS-9).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Diet and physical activity behaviours among people with insomnia symptoms: a cross-sectional survey to understand treatment needs and acceptability.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Association between phase angle and self-rated health among Korean adults: a cross-sectional analysis from the 2022-2023 KNHANES.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe self-rated health (SRH) item is frequently used in health surveys but variations of its form (wording, response options) may hinder comparisons between versions over time or across surveys. The objectives were to determine (a) whether three SRH forms are equivalent, (b) the form with the best construct validity and (c) the best coding scheme to maximize equivalence across forms.
methodsWe used data from 58,023 respondents of the Swiss Health Survey. Three SRH forms were used. Response options varied across forms and we explored four coding schemes (two considering SRH as continuous, two as dichotomous). Construct validity of the SRH was assessed using 34 health predictors to estimate the explained variance.
resultsDistributions of response options were similar across SRH forms, except for the "good" and "very good" options ("good" in form 1: 58.6%, form 2: 65.0% and form 3: 44.1%). Explained variances differed across SRH forms, with form 3 providing the best overall explained variance, regardless of coding schemes. The linear coding scheme maximised the equivalence across SRH forms.
conclusionThe three SRH forms were not equivalent in terms of construct validity. Studies examining the evolution of SRH over time with surveys using different forms should use the linear coding scheme to maximise equivalence between SRH forms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.