ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2022
Midterm results after revision rotator cuff reconstruction: Can ultrasound predict outcome of revision surgery?
Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative rotator cuff tendon integrity, tear size, and muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration are associated with structural outcomes of arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStructural failures after rotator cuff repair are well known, and despite advances and improved techniques in rotator cuff repair (RCR), retear rates remain high. The aim of this study was to (1) evaluate the midterm clinical and radiological outcomes after revision RCR and to (2) analyze whether preoperative ultrasound can predict outcome of open revision rotator cuff repair.
methodsTwenty-five patients who underwent revision RCR in a single institution between 2010 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The Constant Score (CS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score were collected. Ultrasound examination was used both before revision surgery and at follow-up to determine tendon integrity.
resultsAt the final follow-up, 69.6% patients showed an intact rotator cuff and their CS had improved from 28.3 to 77. 30.4% patients had a persisting rotator cuff defect, and the CS had improved from 24 to 47.7. A preoperative tear size of more than 20 mm from an ultrasound examination could be identified as a factor that would risk structural failure of revision RCR.
conclusion(1) Clinical outcomes after revision RCR improve in both patients with an intact RC and those with a retear at midterm follow-up. (2) Ultrasound seems to be a useful tool to predict whether reconstruction of recurrent rotator cuff tears is feasible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.