ArticleNeurocritical care2021
Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05479032 (Amantadine for Neuroenhancement in Acute Patients Study - A Prospective Pilot Proof of Concept Phase IIb Study in Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Amantadine for Neuroenhancement in Acute Patients Study - A Prospective Pilot Proof of Concept Phase IIb Study in Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit Patients
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of melatonin for prolonged disorders of consciousness: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.BMC medicine · 2024Trial
- Prospective Evaluation of Icu Neurostimulant Use for Acute Brain Injury (Prevail): A Pragmatic Observational Cohort Study.Research square · 2026Article
- Modafinil for Promoting Wakefulness in Critically Ill Patients: Current Evidence and Perspectives.Clocks & sleep · 2025Review
- Amantadine Continuation After Hospital Discharge for Acute Stroke Requiring Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Long-term Follow-up Study.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025Article
- Article
- Informing future randomized controlled trials of amantadine hydrochloride in neurocritical care and post-neurocritical care stroke patients through a retrospective study.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Restoring consciousness with pharmacologic therapy: Mechanisms, targets, and future directions.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024Review
- Amantadine as an Aid to Extubation in Severe Acute Brain Injury: A Case Series.The Neurohospitalist · 2024Article
- A National Survey on Coma Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Therapy in India: Revisiting the Curing Coma Campaign Come Together Survey.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Retrospective analysis of amantadine response and predictive factors in intensive care unit patients with non-traumatic disorders of consciousness.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- Understanding, detecting, and stimulating consciousness recovery in the ICU.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Review
- Editorial: Therapeutic relevance and mechanisms of neuro-immune communication in brain injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Improved survival in intensive care unit in severe COVID-19 associated with amantadine use - retrospective study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022Article
- Targeting NMDA Receptor Complex in Management of Epilepsy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Curing Coma Campaign International Survey on Coma Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Therapy (COME TOGETHER).Neurocritical care · 2022Article
- Comment: A Review of Pharmacologic Neurostimulant Use During Rehabilitation and Recovery After Brain Injury.The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2022Article
- Pharmacologic Therapies to Promote Recovery of Consciousness.Seminars in neurology · 2022Article
- Amantadine treatment is associated with improved consciousness in patients with non-traumatic brain injury.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2022Observational
- Role of Neurostimulants During Acute Stroke Care: Do they Improve Wakefulness?Neurocritical care · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveNeurostimulants may improve or accelerate cognitive and functional recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), ischemic stroke (IS), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but few studies have described their safety and effectiveness in the intensive care unit (ICU). The objective of this study was to describe amantadine and modafinil administration practices during acute stroke care starting in the ICU and to evaluate safety and effectiveness.
methodsConsecutive adult ICU patients treated with amantadine and/or modafinil following acute non-traumatic IS, ICH, or SAH were evaluated. Neurostimulant administration data were extracted from the electronic medication administration record, including medication (amantadine, modafinil, or both), starting dose, time from stroke to initiation, and whether the neurostimulant was continued at hospital discharge. Patients were considered responders if they met two of three criteria within 9 days of neurostimulant initiation: increase in Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score ≥ 3 points from pre-treatment baseline, improved wakefulness or participation documented in caregiver notes, or clinical improvement documented in physical or occupational therapy notes. Potential confounders of the effectiveness assessment and adverse drug effects were also recorded.
resultsA total of 87 patients were evaluable during the 3.7-year study period, including 41 (47%) with ICH, 29 (33%) with IS, and 17 (20%) with SAH. The initial neurostimulant administered was amantadine in 71 (82%) patients, modafinil in 13 (15%), or both in 3 (3%) patients. Neurostimulants were initiated a median of 7 (4.25, 12.75) days post-stroke (range 1-27 days) for somnolence (77%), not following commands (32%), lack of eye opening (28%), or low GCS (17%). The most common starting dose was 100 mg twice daily for both amantadine (86%) and modafinil (54%). Of the 79 patients included in the effectiveness evaluation, 42 (53%) were considered responders, including 34/62 (55%) receiving amantadine monotherapy and 8/24 (33%) receiving both amantadine and modafinil at the time they met the definition of a responder. No patient receiving modafinil monotherapy was considered a responder. The median time from initiation to response was 3 (2, 5) days. Responders were more frequently discharged home or to acute rehabilitation compared to non-responders (90% vs 62%, p = 0.006). Among survivors, 63/72 (88%) were prescribed a neurostimulant at hospital discharge. The most common potential adverse drug effect was sleep disruption (16%).
conclusionsNeurostimulant administration during acute stroke care may improve wakefulness. Future controlled studies with a neurostimulant administration protocol, prospective evaluation, and discretely defined response and safety criteria are needed to confirm these encouraging findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.