Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32435964›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2021

Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Angela M Leclerc, Richard R Riker, Caitlin S Brown, Teresa May, Kristina Nocella, Jennifer Cote, Ashley Eldridge, David B Seder, David J Gagnon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05479032 (Amantadine for Neuroenhancement in Acute Patients Study - A Prospective Pilot Proof of Concept Phase IIb Study in Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05479032 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Amantadine for Neuroenhancement in Acute Patients Study - A Prospective Pilot Proof of Concept Phase IIb Study in Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital TuebingenRan2023 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsDisorder of ConsciousnessArmsAmantadine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Restoring consciousness with pharmacologic therapy: Mechanisms, targets, and future directions.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Improved survival in intensive care unit in severe COVID-19 associated with amantadine use - retrospective study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  15. Targeting NMDA Receptor Complex in Management of Epilepsy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angela M LeclercDepartment of Critical Care Services, Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.
Richard R RikerDepartment of Critical Care Services, Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.
Caitlin S BrownDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Teresa MayDepartment of Critical Care Services, Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.
Kristina NocellaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.
Jennifer CoteDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.
Ashley EldridgeDepartment of Critical Care Services, Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.
David B SederDepartment of Critical Care Services, Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.
David J GagnonDepartment of Pharmacy, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA. dgagnon@mmc.org.
Maine Medical Center · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Telemedicine to Reduce Disparities in the Identification and Treatment of Neonatal EncephalopathyP20GM139745 · NIGMS · MAINEHEALTH · PI David B. Seder · 2021 to 2026
$19.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM139745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveNeurostimulants may improve or accelerate cognitive and functional recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), ischemic stroke (IS), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but few studies have described their safety and effectiveness in the intensive care unit (ICU). The objective of this study was to describe amantadine and modafinil administration practices during acute stroke care starting in the ICU and to evaluate safety and effectiveness.

methodsConsecutive adult ICU patients treated with amantadine and/or modafinil following acute non-traumatic IS, ICH, or SAH were evaluated. Neurostimulant administration data were extracted from the electronic medication administration record, including medication (amantadine, modafinil, or both), starting dose, time from stroke to initiation, and whether the neurostimulant was continued at hospital discharge. Patients were considered responders if they met two of three criteria within 9 days of neurostimulant initiation: increase in Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score ≥ 3 points from pre-treatment baseline, improved wakefulness or participation documented in caregiver notes, or clinical improvement documented in physical or occupational therapy notes. Potential confounders of the effectiveness assessment and adverse drug effects were also recorded.

resultsA total of 87 patients were evaluable during the 3.7-year study period, including 41 (47%) with ICH, 29 (33%) with IS, and 17 (20%) with SAH. The initial neurostimulant administered was amantadine in 71 (82%) patients, modafinil in 13 (15%), or both in 3 (3%) patients. Neurostimulants were initiated a median of 7 (4.25, 12.75) days post-stroke (range 1-27 days) for somnolence (77%), not following commands (32%), lack of eye opening (28%), or low GCS (17%). The most common starting dose was 100 mg twice daily for both amantadine (86%) and modafinil (54%). Of the 79 patients included in the effectiveness evaluation, 42 (53%) were considered responders, including 34/62 (55%) receiving amantadine monotherapy and 8/24 (33%) receiving both amantadine and modafinil at the time they met the definition of a responder. No patient receiving modafinil monotherapy was considered a responder. The median time from initiation to response was 3 (2, 5) days. Responders were more frequently discharged home or to acute rehabilitation compared to non-responders (90% vs 62%, p = 0.006). Among survivors, 63/72 (88%) were prescribed a neurostimulant at hospital discharge. The most common potential adverse drug effect was sleep disruption (16%).

conclusionsNeurostimulant administration during acute stroke care may improve wakefulness. Future controlled studies with a neurostimulant administration protocol, prospective evaluation, and discretely defined response and safety criteria are needed to confirm these encouraging findings.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System StimulantsStrokeAdultAmantadineHumansIntensive Care UnitsModafinilRetrospective StudiesAmantadineCentral Nervous System StimulantsModafinilAmantadineCritical careIntracerebral hemorrhageIschemic strokeModafinilNeurostimulantRehabilitationStrokeSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID32435964
PMCPMC7239352
OpenAlexW3027955306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.