Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32435921›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

Influence of different acoustic cues in L1 lexical tone on the perception of L2 lexical stress using principal component analysis: an ERP study.

Yaxuan Meng, Juan Zhang, Shun Liu, Chenggang Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yaxuan MengFaculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau, China. myaxuan112@gmail.com.
Juan ZhangFaculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Shun LiuFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Chenggang WuFaculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau, China.

Funding

Universidade de Macau MYRG2015-00221-FEDUniversidade de Macau MYRG2016-00193-FEDUniversidade de Macau MYRG2017-00217-FED
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have widely explored the prosodic transfer from L1 to L2 during speech perception across stress languages. However, few if any studies have investigated the transfer from L1 tonal language to L2 stress language and the relative roles of different acoustic cues underlying the transfer. Therefore, the current study was conducted to compare the perception of English lexical stress between Mandarin and Cantonese speakers who learn English as a foreign language. The event-related potential measurements and the principal component analysis were conducted for the two groups to explore the roles of different acoustic cues in the perception of English speech. The results demonstrated that compared with the Mandarin group, the Cantonese speakers relied more on pitch information and the reliance holds even when all the three cues varied simultaneously. Therefore, it was concluded that prosodic transfer from L1 lexical tone to L2 lexical stress occurred at the acoustic level, and the native linguistic background shaped the manner how speakers perceived the L2 speech.

Indexed as

MultilingualismPsycholinguisticsAdultCerebral CortexCuesElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePitch PerceptionPrincipal Component AnalysisSpeech PerceptionYoung AdultComponent analysisMMNPhoneticsProsodic transfer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.