ReviewNeuroradiology2020
Epilepsy surgery in children: what the radiologist needs to know.
Review in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanding the scope of pediatric epilepsy surgery: Access, indications, and outcomes in a modern cohort.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Combining interictal and ictal low-density EEG source imaging to delineate the epileptogenic zone in young children.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- Superior lesion detection on 3D FSE T1WI with magnetization transfer and CHESS preparation pulses in children with focal epilepsy: Preliminary results.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2024Article
- Advances in magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of paediatric focal epilepsy: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2024Review
- Pre-operative imaging and post-operative appearance of standard paediatric neurosurgical approaches: a training guide for neuroradiologists.Translational pediatrics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review updates the radiologist on current epilepsy surgery practice in children, with a specific focus on the role of imaging in pre-surgical work-up, current and novel surgical techniques, expected post-surgical imaging appearances and important post-operative complications. A comprehensive review of the current and emerging international practices in paediatric epilepsy surgical planning and post-operative imaging is provided with details on case-based radiological findings. A detailed discussion of the pathophysiology and imaging features of different epileptogenic lesions will not be discussed as this is not the objective of this paper. Epilepsy surgery can be an effective method to control seizures in certain children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Early surgery in selected appropriate cases can lead to improved cognitive and developmental outcome. Advances in neurosurgical techniques, imaging and neuroanaesthesia have driven a parallel expansion in the array of epilepsy conditions which are potentially treatable with surgery. The range of surgical options is now wide, including minimally invasive ablative procedures for small lesions such as hypothalamic hamartomata, resections for focal lesions like hippocampal sclerosis and complex disconnective surgeries for multilobar conditions like Sturge Weber Syndrome and diffuse cortical malformations. An awareness of the surgical thinking when planning epilepsy surgery in children, and the practical knowledge of the operative steps involved will promote more accurate radiology reporting of the post-operative scan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.