ArticleMaterials today. Bio2020
Additive manufactured, highly resilient, elastic, and biodegradable poly(ester)urethane scaffolds with chondroinductive properties for cartilage tissue engineering.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilayer dual-porosity 3D printed scaffolds to recreate the anisotropic microenvironment of the hyaline cartilage.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Melt-Extrusion Additive Manufacturing for Tissue Engineering: Applications and Limitations.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2025Article
- 3D-Printed Poly(ester urethane)/Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/Bioglass Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications.Polymers · 2024Article
- Advances in Additive Manufactured Scaffolds Mimicking the Osteochondral Interface.Advanced nanobiomed research · 2024Article
- A facile strategy for tuning the density of surface-grafted biomolecules for melt extrusion-based additive manufacturing applications.Bio-design and manufacturing · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Review of the Current Research Status of Biodegradable Zinc Alloys and Composites for Biomedical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Mechanobiology-informed biomaterial and tissue engineering strategies for influencing skeletal stem and progenitor cell fate.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- 3D printing of bio-instructive materials: Toward directing the cell.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Installation of click-type functional groups enable the creation of an additive manufactured construct for the osteochondral interface.Biofabrication · 2022Article
- Rational design of biodegradable thermoplastic polyurethanes for tissue repair.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Articular cartilage was thought to be one of the first tissues to be successfully engineered. Despite the avascular and non-innervated nature of the tissue, the cells within articular cartilage - chondrocytes - account for a complex phenotype that is difficult to be maintained in vitro. The use of bone marrow-derived stromal cells (BMSCs) has emerged as a potential solution to this issue. Differentiation of BMSCs toward stable and non-hypertrophic chondrogenic phenotypes has also proved to be challenging. Moreover, hyaline cartilage presents a set of mechanical properties - relatively high Young's modulus, elasticity, and resilience - that are difficult to reproduce. Here, we report on the use of additive manufactured biodegradable poly(ester)urethane (PEU) scaffolds of two different structures (500 μm pore size and 90° or 60° deposition angle) that can support the loads applied onto the knee while being highly resilient, with a permanent deformation lower than 1% after 10 compression-relaxation cycles. Moreover, these scaffolds appear to promote BMSC differentiation, as shown by the deposition of glycosaminoglycans and collagens (in particular collagen II). At gene level, BMSCs showed an upregulation of chondrogenic markers, such as collagen II and the Sox trio, to higher or similar levels than that of traditional pellet cultures, with a collagen II/collagen I relative expression of 2-3, depending on the structure of the scaffold. Moreover, scaffolds with different pore architectures influenced the differentiation process and the final BMSC phenotype. These data suggest that additive manufactured PEU scaffolds could be good candidates for cartilage tissue regeneration in combination with microfracture interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.