Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32435696›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2020

Multiplexed drug testing of tumor slices using a microfluidic platform.

L F Horowitz, A D Rodriguez, Z Dereli-Korkut, R Lin, K Castro, A M Mikheev, R J Monnat, A Folch, R C Rostomily

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Augmented 3D Printing for Multiscale Microphysiological Systems.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Microfluidic Modulation of Microvasculature in Microdissected Tumors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

L F Horowitz1Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7865-1765
A D Rodriguez1Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
Z Dereli-Korkut4Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Hospital and Research Institute, Houston, TX USA.
R Lin1Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6460-686X
K Castro1Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8383-8532
A M Mikheev2Department of Neurosurgery, Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7073-2675
R J Monnat3Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7638-7393
A Folch *1Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9198-8100
R C Rostomily *2Department of Neurosurgery, Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-162X

Funding

Tumor mutation signaturesP01CA077852 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SIDOROVA, JULIA · 1999 to 2019
$26.0M
Microfluidic Device to Profile Chemosensitivity in Glioma Slice CulturesR01CA181445 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FOLCH, ALBERT · 2014 to 2025
$5.3M
“Pharmacologic targeting of NR4A1 and NR4A2 to activate glioblastoma treatment response”R01NS129720 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Andrei M Mikheev, ROBERT C ROSTOMILY · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
Generation of TWIST1 reporters through characterization of TWIST1 dependent netwoR21NS082542 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MIKHEEV, ANDREI M · 2013 to 2014
$476k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA077852NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181445NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129720NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS082542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current methods to assess the drug response of individual human cancers are often inaccurate, costly, or slow. Functional approaches that rapidly and directly assess the response of patient cancer tissue to drugs or small molecules offer a promising way to improve drug testing, and have the potential to identify the best therapy for individual patients. We developed a digitally manufactured microfluidic platform for multiplexed drug testing of intact cancer slice cultures, and demonstrate the use of this platform to evaluate drug responses in slice cultures from human glioma xenografts and patient tumor biopsies. This approach retains much of the tissue microenvironment and can provide results rapidly enough, within days of surgery, to guide the choice of effective initial therapies. Our results establish a useful preclinical platform for cancer drug testing and development with the potential to improve cancer personalized medicine.

Indexed as

ChemotherapyDrug deliveryNanobiotechnology

Identifiers

PMID32435696
PMCPMC7237421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.