Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32435689›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2020

Effect of Pressure-controlled intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PiCSO) on infarct size in anterior STEMI: PiCSO in ACS study.

Mohaned Egred, Alan Bagnall, Ioakim Spyridopoulos, Ian F Purcell, Rajiv Das, Nick Palmer, Ever D Grech, Ajay Jain, Gregg W Stone, Robin Nijveldt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cardioprotective Strategies After Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. "No-Reflow" Phenomenon: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohaned EgredFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Alan BagnallFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ioakim SpyridopoulosFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ian F PurcellFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Rajiv DasFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Nick PalmerLiverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Ever D GrechNorthern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Ajay JainSt. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Gregg W StoneCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Robin NijveldtRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Thomas McAndrewCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Azfar ZamanFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Freeman Hospital · GBCardiovascular Research Foundation · USNorthern General Hospital · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this clinical research was to investigate the effects of Pressure-controlled intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PiCSO) on infarct size at 5 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND

resultsThis comparative study was carried out in four UK hospitals. Forty-five patients with anterior STEMI presenting within 12 h of symptom onset received pPCI plus PiCSO (initiated after reperfusion; n = 45) and were compared with a propensity score-matched control cohort from INFUSE-AMI (n = 80). Infarct size (% of LV mass, median [interquartile range]) measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at day 5 was significantly lower in the PiCSO group (14.3% [95% CI 9.2-19.4%] vs. 21.2% [95% CI 18.0-24.4%]; p = 0.023). There were no major adverse cardiac events (MACE) related to the PiCSO intervention.

conclusionsPiCSO, as an adjunct to pPCI, was associated with a lower infarct size at 5 days after anterior STEMI in a propensity score-matched population.

Indexed as

ACS, acute coronary syndromeAMI, acute myocardial infarctionBARC, Bleeding Academic Research ConsortiumCI, Confidence intervalCMR, Cardiac magnetic resonanceCRT, Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyIMR, Index of microcirculatory resistanceInfarct size reductionLAD, left anterior descending arteryLV, Left ventricleMACE, Major adverse cardiac eventsPiCSO, Pressure-controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusionpPCI, Primary percutaneous coronary interventionPressure-controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion (PICSO)SD, Standard deviationSTEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)TIMI, Thrombosis in myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID32435689
PMCPMC7229496
OpenAlexW3024428895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.