Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32435672›Full record

ArticleRegenerative therapy2020

The importance of scoring recognition fitness in spheroid morphological analysis for robust label-free quality evaluation.

Kazuhide Shirai, Hirohito Kato, Yuta Imai, Mayu Shibuta, Kei Kanie, Ryuji Kato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuhide ShiraiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Hirohito KatoGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Yuta ImaiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Mayu ShibutaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Kei KanieGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Ryuji KatoGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPNikon (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the growing demand for human cell spheroids as functional cellular components for both drug development and regenerative therapy, the technology to non-invasively evaluate their quality has emerged. Image-based morphology analysis of spheroids enables high-throughput screening of their quality. However, since spheroids are three-dimensional, their images can have poor contrast in their surface area, and therefore the total spheroid recognition by image processing is greatly dependent on human who design the filter-set to fit for their own definition of spheroid outline. As a result, the reproducibility of morphology measurement is critically affected by the performance of filter-set, and its fluctuation can disrupt the subsequent morphology-based analysis. Although the unexpected failure derived from the inconsistency of image processing result is a critical issue for analyzing large image data for quality screening, it has been tackled rarely. To achieve robust analysis performances using morphological features, we investigated the influence of filter-set's reproducibility for various types of spheroid data. We propose a new scoring index, the "recognition fitness deviation (RFD)," as a measure to quantitatively and comprehensively evaluate how reproductively a designed filter-set can work with data variations, such as the variations in replicate samples, in time-course samples, and in different types of cells (a total of six normal or cancer cell types). Our result shows that RFD scoring from 5000 images can automatically rank the best robust filter-set for obtaining the best 6-cell type classification model (94% accuracy). Moreover, the RFD score reflected the differences between the worst and the best classification models for morphologically similar spheroids, 60% and 89% accuracy respectively. In addition to RFD scoring, we found that using the time-course of morphological features can augment the fluctuations in spheroid recognitions leading to robust morphological analysis.

Indexed as

Cell manufacturingLabel-free quality evaluationObject recognitionSpheroidSpheroid morphology

Identifiers

PMID32435672
PMCPMC7229423
OpenAlexW3024087797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.