Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32435652›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2020

Comparing Self-Reported Sugar Intake With the Sucrose and Fructose Biomarker From Overnight Urine Samples in Relation to Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.

Stina Ramne, Nicola Gray, Sophie Hellstrand, Louise Brunkwall, Sofia Enhörning, Peter M Nilsson, Gunnar Engström, Marju Orho-Melander, Ulrika Ericson, Gunter G C Kuhnle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Establishing 24-Hour Urinary Sucrose Plus Fructose as a Predictive Biomarker for Total Sugars Intake.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stina RamneDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Nicola GrayDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Sophie HellstrandDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Louise BrunkwallDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Sofia EnhörningDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Peter M NilssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Gunnar EngströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Marju Orho-MelanderDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Ulrika EricsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Gunter G C KuhnleDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Emily SonestedtDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on sugar intake and its link to cardiometabolic risk show inconsistent results, partly due to dietary misreporting. Cost-effective and easily measured nutritional biomarkers that can complement dietary data are warranted. Measurement of 24-h urinary sugars is a biomarker of sugar intake, but there are knowledge gaps regarding the use of overnight urine samples. We aim to compare (1) overnight urinary sucrose and fructose measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, (2) self-reported sugar intake measured with web-based 4-day food records, (3) their composite measure, and (4) these different measures' (1-3) cross-sectional associations with cardiometabolic risk factors in 991 adults in the Malmö Offspring Study (18-69 years, 54% women). The correlations between the reported intakes of total sugar, added sugar and sucrose was higher for urinary sucrose than fructose, and the correlations for the sum or urinary sucrose and fructose (U-sugars) varied between

Indexed as

added sugar intakecardiometabolic risk factorsnutritional biomarkersovernight urinary sugarsurinary sucrose and fructose

Identifiers

PMID32435652
PMCPMC7218081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.