Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32435618›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020

The Role of Immunotherapy in Non-transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma.

Arthur Bobin, Hélène Gardeney, Florence Sabirou, Cécile Gruchet, Anthony Lévy, Laly Nsiala, Laura Cailly, Cécile Tomowiak, Jose Torregrosa, Stéphanie Guidez and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur BobinService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Hélène GardeneyService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Florence SabirouService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Cécile GruchetService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Anthony LévyService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Laly NsialaService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Laura CaillyService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Cécile TomowiakService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Jose TorregrosaService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Stéphanie GuidezService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Xavier LeleuService d'Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the global population is aging and survival in multiple myeloma (MM) is increasing, treating older MM patients, redefined as non-transplant eligible (NTE), is becoming more frequent. Yet, treating these patients remains a real challenge especially because of a marked heterogeneity in the population and an increased susceptibility to treatment toxicity. Indeed, the balance between efficacy and safety must be considered at all time throughout the treatment history for these patients. Therefore, younger and older patients were historically treated in a very different way, even though the safety profile of most anti-myeloma drugs has drastically improved over the years. The emergence of immunotherapy (IT) has largely widened the therapeutic options available in MM and above all has allowed a therapy at optimal dose, and therefore optimal activity, for all patients independently of their frailty features, with no increase in safety issues. Among the novel anti-myeloma IT-based agents, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are now becoming the new backbone of treatment for NTE patients, in association with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Moreover, several new IT-based drugs are currently being developed and investigated either alone or in association; such as new anti-CD38 mAbs, anti-CD38 mAbs with many different combinations, but also the CAR-T cells, bispecific T-cell engager (BiTEs), or antibody drug conjugate (ADC) targeting BCMA. One would expect that immunotherapy will ultimately change and even transform the MM landscape, even for elderly patients. Immunotherapy represents a shift in treatment paradigm in MM as it provides truly efficient drugs with a very favorable safety profile.

Indexed as

elderlyimmunotherapymultiple myelomanon-transplant eligiblenovel therapies

Identifiers

PMID32435618
PMCPMC7218111
OpenAlexW3016345763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.