Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32435543›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Ontogeny of a sexually selected structure in an extant archosaur

David Hone, Jordan C Mallon, Patrick Hennessey, Lawrence M Witmer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. When the lung invades: a review of avian postcranial skeletal pneumaticity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Sex Determination in Reptiles: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

David HoneSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Jordan C MallonBeaty Centre for Species Discovery and Palaeobiology Section, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8209-8827
Patrick HennesseySchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Lawrence M WitmerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7610-0118
Queen Mary University of London · GBCanadian Museum of Nature · CAOhio University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite strong evidence for sexual selection in various display traits and other exaggerated structures in large extinct reptiles, such as dinosaurs, detecting sexual dimorphism in them remains difficult. Their relatively small sample sizes, long growth periods, and difficulties distinguishing the sexes of fossil specimens mean that there are little compelling data on dimorphism in these animals. The extant gharial (

Indexed as

ArchosaurCrocodilianDimorphismDinosaurOntogenySexual selection

Identifiers

PMID32435543
PMCPMC7227661
OpenAlexW3025371211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.