Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32435518›Full record

ReviewPublic health reviews2020

A narrative review of gaps in the provision of integrated care for noncommunicable diseases in India.

Manoj Kumar Pati, N Swaroop, Arin Kar, Preeti Aggarwal, Krishnamurthy Jayanna, Wim Van Damme

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Manoj Kumar Pati1Karnataka Health Promotion Trust, IT Park, 5th floor, 1-4, Rajajinagar Industrial Area behind KSSIDC Admin Office, Rajajinagar, Bangalore, Karnataka 560044 India.ORCID 0000-0002-5625-3037
N Swaroop1Karnataka Health Promotion Trust, IT Park, 5th floor, 1-4, Rajajinagar Industrial Area behind KSSIDC Admin Office, Rajajinagar, Bangalore, Karnataka 560044 India.
Arin Kar1Karnataka Health Promotion Trust, IT Park, 5th floor, 1-4, Rajajinagar Industrial Area behind KSSIDC Admin Office, Rajajinagar, Bangalore, Karnataka 560044 India.
Preeti AggarwalSocial Initiatives, Landmark Group, Bangalore, India.
Krishnamurthy Jayanna1Karnataka Health Promotion Trust, IT Park, 5th floor, 1-4, Rajajinagar Industrial Area behind KSSIDC Admin Office, Rajajinagar, Bangalore, Karnataka 560044 India.
Wim Van Damme4Health Policy Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Karnataka Health Promotion Trust · INInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEManitoba Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs) account for a higher burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCD) and home to a higher number of premature deaths (before age 70) from NCDs. NCDs have become an integral part of the global development agenda; hence, the scope of action on NCDs extends beyond just the health-related sustainable development goal (SDG 3). However, the organization and integration of NCD-related health services have faced several gaps in the LMIC regions such as India. Although the national NCD programme of India has been in operation for a decade, challenges remain in the integration of NCD services at primary care. In this paper, we have analysed existing gaps in the organization and integration of NCD services at primary care and suggested plausible solutions that exist.

methodThe identification of gaps is based out of a review of peer-reviewed articles, reports on national and global guidelines/protocols. The gaps are organized and narrated at four levels such as community, facility, health system, health policy and research, as per the WHO Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions framework (WHO ICCC).

resultThe review found that challenges in the identification of eligible beneficiaries, shortage and poor capacity of frontline health workers, poor functioning of community groups and poor community knowledge on NCD risk factors were key gaps at the community level. Challenges at facility level such as poor facility infrastructure, lack of provider knowledge on standards of NCD care and below par quality of care led to poor management of NCDs. At the health system level, we found, organization of care, programme management and monitoring systems were not geared up to address NCDs. Multi-sectoral collaboration and coordination were proposed at the policy level to tackle NCDs; however, gaps remained in implementation of such policies. Limited research on the effect of health promotion, prevention and, in particular, non-medical interventions on NCDs was found as a key gap at the research level.

conclusionThis paper reinforces the need for an integrated comprehensive model of NCD care especially at primary health care level to address the growing burden of these diseases. This overarching review is quite relevant and useful in organizing NCD care in Indian and similar LMIC settings.

Indexed as

Continuum of careFollow-up and referralHealth service deliveryMonitoring systemsNoncommunicable diseasesPrivate health sectorScreening for NCDsUrban health

Identifiers

PMID32435518
PMCPMC7222468
OpenAlexW3027137979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.