ReviewSAGE open medicine2020
Bioaugmentation in the surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: A review of current concepts and emerging techniques.
Review in SAGE open medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05582226 (A Randomized, Single Blinded Study of the Augmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Stump-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Versus Standard of Care Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Single Blinded Study of the Augmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Stump-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Versus Standard of Care Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Rehabilitation Training Based on Automatic Extraction Algorithm on Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Caused by Exercise.Scanning · 2022Trial
- Effects of accelerated rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction on clinical and functional outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating clinical meaningfulness.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Artelon Graft Augmentation in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Surgical Technique Guide.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Translational Potential of an Electrospun Polycaprolactone Scaffold for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Advanced fiber materials · 2026Article
- Intratendinous Normal Saline Injection of Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Allografts Does Not Reduce Mechanical Strength at Time Zero.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Biologic Augmentation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Beyond: A Review of PRP and BMAC.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A comparative study of collagen morphology and joint strength in anterior cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction models in rabbits.Veterinary world · 2025Article
- Extracellular Vesicles from Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Ligament-Bone Integration After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair in Rabbit.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament injury: a global expert consensus statement.Burns & trauma · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of suture-augmented and standard hamstring autograft single-bundle ACL reconstruction outcomes: short-term functional benefits without long-term impact.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a historical view.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Bio-Enhanced Neoligaments Graft Bearing FE002 Primary Progenitor Tenocytes: Allogeneic Tissue Engineering & Surgical Proofs-of-Concept for Hand Ligament Regenerative Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Predictive simulation of single-leg landing scenarios for ACL injury risk factors evaluation.PloS one · 2023Article
- Advanced Gene Therapy Strategies for the Repair of ACL Injuries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Artelon as a Bio-Scaffold to Augment Collateral Ligament Repair after Knee Dislocation.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2022Article
- Is Lever Test Superior to Lachman, Pivot Shift, Drawer Tests in Diagnosing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries?Cureus · 2022Article
- Second Generation of Tissue-Engineered Ligament Substitutes for Torn ACL Replacement: Adaptations for Clinical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Is Biological Augmentation Beneficial?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injuries involving the anterior cruciate ligament are among the most common athletic injuries, and are the most common involving the knee. The anterior cruciate ligament is a key translational and rotational stabilizer of the knee joint during pivoting and cutting activities. Traditionally, surgical intervention in the form of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been recommended for those who sustain an anterior cruciate ligament rupture and wish to remain active and return to sport. The intra-articular environment of the anterior cruciate ligament makes achieving successful healing following repair challenging. Historically, results following repair were poor, and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction emerged as the gold-standard for treatment. While earlier literature reported high rates of return to play, the results of more recent studies with longer follow-up have suggested that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may not be as successful as once thought: fewer athletes are able to return to sport at their preinjury level, and many still go on to develop osteoarthritis of the knee at a relatively younger age. The four principles of tissue engineering (cells, growth factors, scaffolds, and mechanical stimuli) combined in various methods of bioaugmentation have been increasingly explored in an effort to improve outcomes following surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Newer technologies have also led to the re-emergence of anterior cruciate ligament repair as an option for select patients. The different biological challenges associated with anterior cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction each present unique opportunities for targeted bioaugmentation strategies that may eventually lead to better outcomes with better return-to-play rates and fewer revisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.