ArticleDental research journal
Article in Dental research journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of oral streptococci and glucosyltransferase genes in mother-child pairs: a cross-sectional study in Turkish families.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Diabetes and oral health: A comparative cross-sectional analysis of DMFT index among diabetic, pre-diabetic, and non-diabetic adults.PloS one · 2025Article
- Plaque Microbiome in Caries-Active and Caries-Free Teeth by Dentition.JDR clinical and translational research · 2024Article
- Pathophysiology of Demineralization, Part II: Enamel White Spots, Cavitated Caries, and Bone Infection.Current osteoporosis reports · 2022Review
- Quantity of the antigens ofJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMATERIALS AND
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 459 adults completed a Sugar Frequency Questionnaire and were examined for dental caries using DMFT index, sugar consumption level, and tooth brushing frequency per day. Saliva and plaque samples were collected, and the target population without
resultsNearly 77.1% of the study population were harboring
conclusionThis study provides a recent report from
Indexed as
Identifiers
32435436PMC7224268W3011222602What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.