ArticleWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics
A selective overview of feature screening methods with applications to neuroimaging data.
Article in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust High-Dimensional Regression with Coefficient Thresholding and its Application to Imaging Data Analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024Article
- Sure Joint Screening for High Dimensional Cox's Proportional Hazards Model Under the Case-Cohort Design.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2023Article
- The Kendall interaction filter for variable interaction screening in high dimensional classification problems.Journal of applied statistics · 2023Article
- Lessons from the Criticality of the Spanish High Capacity Road Network on Direct, Representative Democracies and Technocracies.Applied spatial analysis and policy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In neuroimaging studies, regression models are frequently used to identify the association of the imaging features and clinical outcome, where the number of imaging features (e.g., hundreds of thousands of voxel-level predictors) much outweighs the number of subjects in the studies. Classical best subset selection or penalized variable selection methods that perform well for low- or moderate-dimensional data do not scale to ultrahigh-dimensional neuroimaging data. To reduce the dimensionality, variable screening has emerged as a powerful tool for feature selection in neuroimaging studies. We present a selective review of the recent developments in ultrahigh-dimensional variable screening, with a focus on their practical performance on the analysis of neuroimaging data with complex spatial correlation structures and high-dimensionality. We conduct extensive simulation studies to compare the performance on selection accuracy and computational costs between the different methods. We present analyses of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data in the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange study. This article is categorized under: Applications of Computational Statistics > Computational and Molecular BiologyStatistical Learning and Exploratory Methods of the Data Sciences > Image Data MiningStatistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Analysis of High Dimensional Data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.