ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020
Combining QTL Analysis and Genomic Predictions for Four Durum Wheat Populations Under Drought Conditions.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic prediction models for morpho-phenological traits in durum wheat based on Vrn, Ppd, and Rht alleles.The plant genome · 2025Article
- DPImpute: A Genotype Imputation Framework for Ultra-Low Coverage Whole-Genome Sequencing and its Application in Genomic Selection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- What plant breeding may (and may not) look like in 2050?The plant genome · 2024Review
- Univariate and multivariate genomic prediction for agronomic traits in durum wheat under two field conditions.PloS one · 2024Article
- Genomic regions of durum wheat involved in water productivity.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Article
- Genomics for Yield and Yield Components in Durum Wheat.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Genomic regions involved in the control of 1,000-kernel weight in wild relative-derived populations of durum wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genetics and breeding for resistance against four leaf spot diseases in wheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- A comprehensive meta-QTL analysis for yield-related traits of durum wheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Mapping freezing tolerance QTL in alfalfa: based on indoor phenotyping.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Genomic Prediction for Fusarium Head Blight Resistance with a Multi-Parental Population.Biology · 2021Article
- Article
- From Genetic Maps to QTL Cloning: An Overview for Durum Wheat.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Detection of grain yield QTLs in the durum population Lahn/Cham1 tested in contrasting environments.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2021Article
- Molecular Mapping and Genomics of Grain Yield in Durum Wheat: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Durum wheat is an important crop for the human diet and its consumption is gaining popularity. In order to ensure that durum wheat production maintains the pace with the increase in demand, it is necessary to raise productivity by approximately 1.5% per year. To deliver this level of annual genetic gain the incorporation of molecular strategies has been proposed as a key solution. Here, four RILs populations were used to conduct QTL discovery for grain yield (GY) and 1,000 kernel weight (TKW). A total of 576 individuals were sown at three locations in Morocco and one in Lebanon. These individuals were genotyped by sequencing with 3,202 high-confidence polymorphic markers, to derive a consensus genetic map of 2,705.7 cM, which was used to impute any missing data. Six QTLs were found to be associated with GY and independent from flowering time on chromosomes 2B, 4A, 5B, 7A and 7B, explaining a phenotypic variation (PV) ranging from 4.3 to 13.4%. The same populations were used to train genomic prediction models incorporating the relationship matrix, the genotype by environment interaction, and marker by environment interaction, to reveal significant advantages for models incorporating the marker effect. Using training populations (TP) in full sibs relationships with the validation population (VP) was shown to be the only effective strategy, with accuracies reaching 0.35-0.47 for GY. Reducing the number of markers to 10% of the whole set, and the TP size to 20% resulted in non-significant changes in accuracies. The QTLs identified were also incorporated in the models as fixed effects, showing significant accuracy gain for all four populations. Our results confirm that the prediction accuracy depends considerably on the relatedness between TP and VP, but not on the number of markers and size of TP used. Furthermore, feeding the model with information on markers associated with QTLs increased the overall accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.