ArticleCancer cell international2020
Association of human
Article in Cancer cell international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Markers of Tumor Multiplicity in Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: Associations of 19 SNPs in an Italian Cohort.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Molecular markers associated with elevated colorectal cancer risk: a mini review.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2025Review
- Low-Penetrance Susceptibility Variants in Colorectal Cancer-Current Outlook in the Field.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Role of rs873601 Polymorphisms in Prognosis of Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Bridging the splicing gap in human genetics with long-read RNA sequencing: finding the protein isoform drivers of disease.Human molecular genetics · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of the present study is to comprehensively evaluate the impact of the rs1800975 A/G polymorphism within the human xeroderma pigmentosum group A (
methodsWe retrieved possible relevant publications from a total of six electronic databases (updated to April 2020) and selected eligible case-control studies for pooled assessment.
resultsIn total, 71 case-control studies with 19,257 cases and 30,208 controls from 52 publications were included for pooling analysis. We observed an enhanced overall cancer susceptibility in cancer cases compared with negative controls in the Caucasian subgroup analysis for the genetic models of allelic G vs. A, carrier G vs. A, homozygotic GG vs AA, heterozygotic AG vs. AA, dominant AG + GG vs. AA and recessive GG vs. AA + AG (
conclusionsOur findings provide evidence of the close relationship between the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.