ReviewBulletin of the National Research Centre2020
Bacterial vaccines in poultry.
Review in Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Assessment ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026Article
- An Overview of Avian Vaccination Options in Zoological Collections in Europe.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Avian PathogenicVeterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Control of Salmonella in poultry: The role of host immunity and vaccines.Poultry science · 2025Review
- H5N1 Avian Influenza: A Narrative Review of Scientific Advances and Global Policy Challenges.Viruses · 2025Review
- A Mini-Review on Multi-Hurdle Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Epitope mapping of recombinant Salmonella enterica serotype Heidelberg flagellar hook-associated protein by in silico and in vivo approaches.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- The Immunogenic Potential of an Inactivated Vaccine Candidate againstArchives of Razi Institute · 2024Article
- Advances in Poultry Vaccines: Leveraging Biotechnology for Improving Vaccine Development, Stability, and Delivery.Vaccines · 2024Review
- Review
- Review
- Practical Preventive Considerations for Reducing the Public Health Burden of Poultry-Related Salmonellosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Holistic Strategies to ControlMicroorganisms · 2023Review
- Effects of embryonic thermal manipulation on the immune response to post-hatchVeterinary world · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Bacterial Vaccines Combating Antimicrobial Resistance in Poultry.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Identification of Subunits for Novel Universal Vaccines against Three Predominant Serogroups and the Emerging O145 among Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli by Pan-RV Pipeline.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Prevention and Control of HumanInternational journal of food science · 2023Review
- Preventing bacterial disease in poultry in the post-antibiotic era: a case for innate immunity modulation as an alternative to antibiotic use.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Designing of novel chimeric PvpA-pMGA protein of Mycoplasma gallisepticum, applicable for indirect ELISA.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoultry bacterial pathogens are mainly controlled by using high-cost sanitary measures and medical treatment. However, the drug-resistant strains of pathogens continuously emerge, and medical treatments are often ineffective. Moreover, there is increasing public objections to drug residues in poultry products. The other important type of control is the vaccination which depends on immunity. This immunological control is the major practical alternative to chemotherapy. Success of vaccines in combating poultry diseases depends mainly on the choice of the proper type of vaccines, correct time of its usage, and method of administration.The types of vaccines include attenuated live vaccines, and these vaccines were shown to be effective in inducing protection. The second type is killed vaccine or whole bacteria extracts which is less successful in providing protection compared to live vaccines. The metabolic product vaccine (toxoids) is the third type of vaccine. The recombinant DNA technique was adopted to produce the protective antigens in a sufficient amount and in cost-effective ways.
conclusionsProtection studies against bacterial diseases were performed by using several trials: living vaccines (live attenuated vaccines; live, non-pathogenic microorganisms; live, low virulence microorganism), inactivated (killed) vaccines (heat-inactivated, chemical inactivates, radiation), metabolic product vaccines (toxoids), subunit vaccines (whole cell proteins, outer membrane proteins, purified flagellar proteins (flagellin), fimbrial proteins, pilus proteins, lipopolysaccharides), vaccines produced by recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) technology, and DNA vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.