Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32434920›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Epstein-Barr virus co-opts TFIIH component XPB to specifically activate essential viral lytic promoters.

Dinesh Verma, Trenton Mel Church, Sankar Swaminathan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dinesh VermaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132.
Trenton Mel ChurchDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132.
Sankar SwaminathanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132; sankar.swaminathan@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9773-1277
University of Utah · US

Funding

POSTTRANSCRIPTIONAL GENE REGULATION BY EBV SM PROTEINR01CA081133 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SWAMINATHAN, SANKAR · 1999 to 2022
$4.9M
Restriction of Oncogenic Herpesviruses by Host Cell FactorsI01BX002262 · VA · VA SALT LAKE CITY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI SWAMINATHAN, SANKAR · 2015 to 2019
–
BLRD VA I01 BX002262NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with epithelial and lymphoid malignancies, establishes latent infection in memory B cells, and intermittently produces infectious virions through lytic replication. Released virions play a key role in latent reservoir maintenance and transmission. Lytic EBV transcription differs from cellular transcription in requiring a virus-encoded preinitiation complex that binds to TATT motifs unique to EBV late lytic promoters. Expression of 15 late lytic genes that are important for virion production and infectivity is particularly dependent on the EBV SM protein, a nuclear protein expressed early during lytic reactivation that binds to viral RNAs and enhances RNA stability. We recently discovered that spironolactone blocks EBV virion production by inhibiting EBV SM function. Since spironolactone causes degradation of xeroderma pigmentosum group B-complementing protein (XPB), a component of human transcription factor TFIIH, in both B lymphocytes and epithelial cells, we hypothesized that SM utilizes XPB to specifically activate transcription of SM target promoters. While EBV SM has been thought to act posttranscriptionally, we provide evidence that SM also facilitates EBV gene transcription. We demonstrate that SM binds and recruits XPB to EBV promoters during lytic replication. Depletion of XPB protein, by spironolactone treatment or by siRNA transfection, inhibits SM-dependent late lytic gene transcription but not transcription of other EBV genes or cellular genes. These data indicate that SM acts as a transcriptional activator that has co-opted XPB to specifically target 15 EBV promoters that have uniquely evolved to require XPB for activity, providing an additional mechanism to differentially regulate EBV gene expression.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsGene Expression Regulation, ViralHerpesvirus 4, HumanHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansPhosphoproteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticProteolysisRNA, Small InterferingSpironolactoneTrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional ActivationVirionDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesPhosphoproteinsRNA, Small InterferingSM protein, Human herpesvirus 4SpironolactoneTrans-ActivatorsXPBC-ERCC-3 proteinEpstein–Barr virusherpesvirustranscriptionXPB

Identifiers

PMID32434920
PMCPMC7293708
OpenAlexW3027389692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.