ArticlemSphere2020
Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Brucella canis RM6/66 Δ
Article in mSphere, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A method for discovery of transcription factors controllingMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- The atypical quorum sensing system of classicalJournal of bacteriology · 2025Review
- Quorum sensing LuxR proteins VjbR and BabR jointly regulateJournal of bacteriology · 2025Article
- A case of polycystic kidney disease infection caused byFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The emergence ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2023Review
- Primary and memory immune responses against roughFrontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Brucellosis Vaccines: A Comprehensive Review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- Uncovering the Hidden Credentials ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021Review
- When the Going Gets Rough: The Significance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Canine Brucellosis: An Update.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.