Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32434488›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

High-dose omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation might be more superior than low-dose for major depressive disorder in early therapy period: a network meta-analysis.

Xu-Dong Luo, Jin-Shan Feng, Zheng Yang, Qiao-Ting Huang, Ju-da Lin, Bo Yang, Kuan-Pin Su, Ji-Yang Pan

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Depression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xu-Dong LuoDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Jin-Shan FengMarine Medicine Research Institute, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524023, China.
Zheng YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, China.
Qiao-Ting HuangDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Ju-da LinDepartment of Psychiatry, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, China.
Bo YangInstitute of Lipids Medicine and School of Public Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Kuan-Pin SuDepartment of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 400, Taiwan.
Ji-Yang PanDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. jiypan@163.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNGuangdong Medical College · CNChina Medical University · TWWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (CN) 2017A030313648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (n-3 PUFAs) supplementation for major depressive disorder (MDD) has been widely discussed in recent years, but its efficacy and application are still controversial. This network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different dosages of n-3 PUFAs on MDD patients in the early period of treatment.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the efficacy of n-3 PUFA supplementation for patients with MDD were retrieved from the databases of Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. RCTs comparing the efficacy of n-3 PUFA for adult (≥18 years) MDD patients without comorbidity were eligible for our study. The score of depressive symptoms in early therapy period of the treatment (≤9 weeks) was extracted. Standardized mean deviations (SMDs) of all the sores from the eligible RCTs were synthesized in a pairwise meta-analysis in frequentist framework and a random-effects network meta-analysis in Bayesian framework for the overall and subgroups (high- and low-dose) efficacy of n-3 PUFAs.

resultsA total of 910 MDD patients in 10 trials with 3 adjuvant therapy strategies (high-dose n-3 PUFAs, low-dose n-3 PUFAs and placebo) were included. Results of pairwise meta-analysis showed that n-3 PUFAs were superior to placebo (SMD: 1.243 ± 0.596; 95% CI: 0.060 ~ 2.414). Results of the network meta-analysis showed that both the high (SMD: 0.908 ± 0.331; 95% CI: 0.262 ~ 1.581) and the low-dose (SMD: 0.601 ± 0.286; 95% CI: 0.034 ~ 1.18) n-3 PUFAs were superior to placebo, and the efficacy of high-dose n-3 PUFAs is superior to that of low-dose.

conclusionsHigh-dose n-3 PUFAs supplementation might be more superior than low-dose in the early therapy period for MDD. More head-to-head clinical trials need to be carried out to provide more direct comparison and enhance the evidence of the efficacy of n-3PUFAs for MDD.

Indexed as

AdultDietary SupplementsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFatty Acids, Omega-3Fatty Acids, UnsaturatedHumansMajor Depressive DisorderTreatment OutcomeFatty Acids, Omega-3Fatty Acids, UnsaturatedMajor depressive disorderNetwork meta-analysisOmega-3Polyunsaturated fatty acidSupplementation

Identifiers

PMID32434488
PMCPMC7238659
OpenAlexW3027225672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.