Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32434479›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Association of childhood out-of-home care status with all-cause mortality up to 42-years later: Office of National Statistics Longitudinal Study.

Emily T Murray, Rebecca Lacey, Barbara Maughan, Amanda Sacker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Young Adults with a History of Residential Youth Care: A Cohort Profile of a Hard-to-Reach Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily T MurrayDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LONDON, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Rebecca LaceyDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LONDON, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Barbara MaughanMRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Amanda SackerDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LONDON, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. a.sacker@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8796-5398

Funding

Nuffield Foundation JUS/43052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe adverse life-long consequences of being looked-after as a child are well recognised, but follow-up periods for mortality risk have mostly ended in young adulthood and mortality suggested to differ by age of placement, gender and cohort in small samples.

methodsData on 353,601 Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study (LS) members during census years 1971-2001, and Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-varying covariates (age as the timescale), were used to examine whether childhood out-of-home care was associated with all-cause mortality until the end of 2013. After adjusting for baseline age and age

resultsAdults who had been in care at any census (maximum of two) had an adjusted all-cause mortality hazard ratio 1.62 (95% CI 1.43, 1.86) times higher than adults who had never been in care. The excess mortality was mainly attributable to deaths categorised as self-harm, accidents and mental & behavioural causes. Mortality risk was elevated if the LS member was initially assessed in 1981 or 2001, compared to 1971. There was no significant variation in mortality risk for those in care by age or gender. The main findings were consistent irrespective of choice of comparison group (whole population, disadvantaged population), care placement (residential, non-residential) and age at death (all ages, adulthood only).

conclusionsIn this large, nationally representative study of dependent children resident in England and Wales, those who had been in care during childhood had a higher risk of mortality long after they had left care on average, mainly from unnatural causes. No differences by age or gender were found. Children in care have not benefitted from the general decline in mortality risk over time.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathChild CareResidence CharacteristicsResidential FacilitiesAccidentsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleChild welfareEnglandFoster careLife courseLongitudinalLooked after childrenMortalityWales

Identifiers

PMID32434479
PMCPMC7238620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.