Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32434215›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Effect of adjuvant radiotherapy in elderly patients with breast cancer.

Tanja Nadine Stueber, Joachim Diessner, Catharina Bartmann, Elena Leinert, Wolfgang Janni, Daniel Herr, Rolf Kreienberg, Achim Woeckel, Manfred Wischnewsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanja Nadine StueberDepartment for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wuerzburg Medical School, Wuerzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0145-5739
Joachim DiessnerDepartment for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wuerzburg Medical School, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Catharina BartmannDepartment for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wuerzburg Medical School, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Elena LeinertDepartment for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm Medical School, Ulm, Germany.
Wolfgang JanniDepartment for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm Medical School, Ulm, Germany.
Daniel HerrDepartment for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wuerzburg Medical School, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Rolf KreienbergDepartment for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm Medical School, Ulm, Germany.
Achim WoeckelDepartment for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wuerzburg Medical School, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Manfred WischnewskyDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiotherapy (RT) is of critical importance in the locoregional management of early breast cancer. Although RT is routinely used following breast conserving surgery (BCS), patients may occasionally be effectively treated with BCS alone. Currently, the selection of patients undergoing BCS who do not need breast irradiation is under investigation. With the advancement of personalized medicine, there is an increasing interest in reduction of aggressive treatments especially in older women. The primary objective of this study was to identify elderly patients who may forego breast irradiation after BCS without measurable consequences on local tumor growth and survival.

methodsWe analyzed 2384 early breast cancer patients aged 70 and older who were treated in 17 German certified breast cancer centers between 2001 and 2009. We compared RT versus no RT after guideline adherent (GA) BCS. The outcomes studied were breast cancer recurrence (RFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Low-risk patients were defined by luminal A, tumor size T1 or T2 and node-negative whereas higher-risk patients were defined by patients with G3 or T3/T4 or node-positive or other than Luminal A tumors. To test if there is a difference between two or more survival curves, we used the Gp family of tests of Harrington and Fleming.

resultsThe median age was 77 yrs (mean 77.6±5.6 y) and the median observation time 46 mths (mean 48.9±24.8 mths). 950 (39.8%) patients were low-risk and 1434 (60.2%) were higher-risk. 1298 (54.4%) patients received GA BCS of which 85.0% (1103) received GA-RT and only 15% (195) did not. For low-risk patients with GA-BCS there were no significant differences in RFS (log rank p = 0.651) and in BCSS (p = 0.573) stratified by GA-RT. 5 years RFS in both groups were > 97%. For higher-risk patients with GA-BCS we found a significant difference (p<0.001) in RFS and tumor-associated OS stratified by GA-RT. The results remain the same after adjusting by adjuvant systemic treatment (AST) and comorbidity (ASA and NYHA).

conclusionsPatients aged 70 years and older suffering from low-risk early breast cancer with GA-BCS can avoid breast irradiation with <3% chance of relapse. In the case of higher-risk, breast irradiation should be used routinely following GA-BCS. As a side effect of these results, removing the entire breast of elderly low risk patients to spare them from breast irradiation seems to be not necessary.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, SegmentalRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGeriatricsHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32434215
PMCPMC7239665
OpenAlexW3027059982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.