Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32434161›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2020

Host tissue response to floating microelectrode arrays chronically implanted in the feline spinal nerve.

Christi L Kolarcik, Carlos A Castro, Andrew Lesniak, Anthony J Demetris, Lee E Fisher, Robert A Gaunt, Douglas J Weber, X Tracy Cui

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sharpened and Mechanically Durable Carbon Fiber Electrode Arrays for Neural Recording.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christi L KolarcikDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4025-5871
Carlos A CastroMagee Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Andrew LesniakDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Anthony J DemetrisMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Lee E FisherDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-3119
Robert A GauntDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6202-5818
Douglas J WeberDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
X Tracy CuiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
University of Pittsburgh · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · US

Funding

Multichannel Microstimulation of Primary Afferent Neurons to Restore ProprioceptiR01NS072342 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WEBER, DOUGLAS J · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeural interfacing technologies could significantly improve quality of life for people living with the loss of a limb. Both motor commands and sensory feedback must be considered; these complementary systems are segregated from one another in the spinal nerve. APPROACH: The dorsal root ganglion-ventral root (DRG-VR) complex was targeted chronically with floating microelectrode arrays designed to record from motor neuron axons in the VR or stimulate sensory neurons in the DRG. Hematoxylin and eosin and Nissl/Luxol fast blue staining were performed. Characterization of the tissue response in regions of interest and pixel-based image analyses were used to quantify MAC387 (monocytes/macrophages), NF200 (axons), S100 (Schwann cells), vimentin (fibroblasts, endothelial cells, astrocytes), and GLUT1 (glucose transport proteins) reactivity. Implanted roots were compared to non-implanted roots and differences between the VR and DRG examined. MAIN

resultsThe tissue response associated with chronic array implantation in this peripheral location is similar to that observed in central nervous system locations. Markers of inflammation were increased in implanted roots relative to control roots with MAC387 positive cells distributed throughout the region corresponding to the device footprint. Significant decreases in neuronal density and myelination were observed in both the VR, which contains only neuronal axons, and the DRG, which contains both neuronal axons and cell bodies. Notably, decreases in NF200 in the VR were observed only at implant times less than ten weeks. Observations related to the blood-nerve barrier and tissue integrity suggest that tissue remodeling occurs, particularly in the VR. SIGNIFICANCE: This study was designed to assess the viability of the DRG-VR complex as a site for neural interfacing applications and suggests that continued efforts to mitigate the tissue response will be critical to achieve the overall goal of a long-term, reliable neural interface.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsQuality of LifeAnimalsAxonsCatsGanglia, SpinalMicroelectrodes

Identifiers

PMID32434161
PMCPMC7768891
OpenAlexW3027523426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.