Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32434067›Full record

Trial reportClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2021

Gastrointestinal Eosinophil Responses in a Longitudinal, Randomized Trial of Peanut Oral Immunotherapy.

Benjamin L Wright, Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker, Neeraja Kambham, Natasha Purington, Shu Cao, Dana Tupa, Wenming Zhang, Sayantani B Sindher, Matthew A Rank, Hirohito Kita and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02103270 (Single Center, Placebo Controlled Clinical Study in Desensitization vs Tolerance Induction in Peanut Allergy Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02103270 phase2completednot on this map

Single Center, Placebo Controlled Clinical Study in Desensitization vs Tolerance Induction in Peanut Allergy Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2014 to 2018Enrolled120ConditionsPeanut AllergyArmsPeanut Protein 4,000mg, Oat Flour, Peanut Protein 300 mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Gastrointestinal manifestations during oral immunotherapy: A guide for pediatric allergists.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia in oral immunotherapy: context and clinical application.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in adults and children in Canada: a Delphi consensus project.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  9. Food allergy and eosinophilic esophagitis: Oral immunotherapy reveals a disease in flux.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2025
    Article
  10. Food oral immunotherapy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Eosinophilic esophagitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Review
  13. Immunomodulatory metabolites in IgE-mediated food allergy and oral immunotherapy outcomes based on metabolomic profiling.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Relationship Between Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Immunotherapy.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. A case of food and aeroallergen sublingual immunotherapy inducing eosinophilic esophagitis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2023
    Article
  20. Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin L WrightDivision of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona; Division of Pulmonology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Nielsen Q Fernandez-BeckerSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Neeraja KambhamSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Natasha PuringtonSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Shu CaoSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Dana TupaSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Wenming ZhangSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Sayantani B SindherSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Matthew A RankDivision of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona; Division of Pulmonology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Hirohito KitaDivision of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona; Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona.
David A KatzkaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kelly P ShimDivision of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona; Division of Pulmonology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Bryan J BunningSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Alfred D DoyleDivision of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Elizabeth A JacobsenDivision of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona; Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Mindy TsaiSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Scott D BoydDivision of Pulmonology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Monali ManoharSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
R Sharon ChinthrajahSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: schinths@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USPhoenix Children's Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USStanford Medicine · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Tracking allergen specific T cells in multi-food allergyU19AI104209 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHINTHRAJAH, R. SHARON · 2013 to 2025
$17.3M
SEAL (Stopping Atopic dermatitis and ALlergy) Study: Prevent allergy by enhancing the skin barrierU01AI147462 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mary Johnson, GIDEON LACK · 2020 to 2026
$14.0M
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PATHOGENIC AND PROTECTIVE PEANUT ALLERGEN-SPECIFIC HUMAN ANTIBODIESR01AI125567 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, SCOTT DEXTER · 2017 to 2022
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125567NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI147462NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI104209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsGastrointestinal side effects are common during oral immunotherapy (OIT) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a potential complication. We aimed to characterize eosinophilic gastrointestinal responses to peanut OIT, in which peanut protein is given orally, with incremental increases in dose over time.

methodsTwenty adults with IgE-mediated peanut allergy were randomly assigned to groups given peanut OIT (n = 15) or placebo (n = 5); 1 additional subject withdrew before randomization. Serial gastrointestinal biopsies were collected at baseline (n = 21, 0 weeks), following dose escalation (n = 10, 52 weeks), and during the maintenance phase (n = 11, 104 weeks). Endoscopic findings were characterized using the EoE endoscopic reference score. Biopsies were assessed for eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf) and other pathology features using EoE histologic scoring system scores. We performed immunohistochemical analyses of eosinophil peroxidase deposition, quantified using automated image analysis.

resultsAt baseline, no subjects reported current gastrointestinal symptoms. However, 3 of the 21 subjects (14%) had esophageal peak eosinophil counts ≥15 eos/hpf and all subjects had dilated intercellular spaces (DIS). OIT induced or exacerbated esophageal eosinophilia (EE) at 52 weeks in most subjects (peak eosinophil counts >5 eos/hpf in 6 of 7 patients [86%]; peak eosinophil counts ≥15 eos/hpf in 4 of 7 patients [57%]). One subject met clinicopathologic criteria for EoE and withdrew; no significant changes in esophageal peak eosinophil counts were observed in the placebo group. EE in the OIT group corresponded with significant increases in EoE histologic scoring system scores and deposition of eosinophil peroxidase. In 4 of 6 participants (67%), OIT-induced EE and gastrointestinal eosinophilia resolved by the end of the maintenance phase. Gastrointestinal symptoms were not clearly associated with EE or gastrointestinal eosinophilia.

conclusionsIn this pilot study, we found that peanut OIT-induced EE and gastrointestinal eosinophilia are usually transient and are not always associated with gastrointestinal symptoms. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02103270.

Indexed as

Eosinophilic EsophagitisPeanut HypersensitivityAdultArachisEosinophilsHumansImmunotherapyPilot ProjectsEoEHSSEREFSFood AllergyInflammation

Identifiers

PMID32434067
PMCPMC8445108
OpenAlexW3024512364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.