Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32433869›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2020

The Relationship between Effective Molarity and Affinity Governs Rate Enhancements in Tethered Kinase-Substrate Reactions.

Elizabeth B Speltz, Jesse G Zalatan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The optimal docking strength for reversibly tethered kinases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Druggable Transient Pockets in Protein Kinases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Intrinsically disordered linkers control tethered kinases via effective concentration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth B SpeltzDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Jesse G ZalatanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1458-0654
University of Washington · US

Funding

Spatial Organization in Biochemical Reaction NetworksR35GM124773 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jesse George Zalatan · 2017 to 2026
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaffold proteins are thought to accelerate protein phosphorylation reactions by tethering kinases and substrates together, but there is little quantitative data on their functional effects. To assess the contribution of tethering to kinase reactivity, we compared intramolecular and intermolecular kinase reactions in a minimal model system. We found that tethering can enhance reaction rates in a flexible tethered kinase system and that the magnitude of the effect is sensitive to the structure of the tether. The largest effective molarity we obtained was ∼0.08 μM, which is much lower than the effects observed in small molecule model systems and other tethered protein reactions. We further demonstrated that the tethered intramolecular reaction only makes a significant contribution to the observed rates when the scaffolded complex assembles at concentrations below the effective molarity. These findings provide a quantitative framework that can be applied to understand endogenous protein scaffolds and engineer synthetic networks.

Indexed as

AnimalsCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesMicePhosphorylationSubstrate SpecificityCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID32433869
PMCPMC7328773
OpenAlexW3028354942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.