Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32433742›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2020

Extended ORF8 Gene Region Is Valuable in the Epidemiological Investigation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Similar Coronavirus.

Shuaiyin Chen, Xin Zheng, Jingyuan Zhu, Ronghua Ding, Yuefei Jin, Weiguo Zhang, HaiYan Yang, Yingjuan Zheng, Xin Li, Guangcai Duan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Potential Therapeutic Target and Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Structural biology of SARS-CoV-2: open the door for novel therapies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuaiyin ChenZhengzhou University College of Public Health, Zhengzhou, China.
Xin ZhengTaoharmony Biotech Ltd, Hangzhou, China.
Jingyuan ZhuZhengzhou University College of Public Health, Zhengzhou, China.
Ronghua DingZhengzhou University College of Public Health, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuefei JinZhengzhou University College of Public Health, Zhengzhou, China.
Weiguo ZhangZhengzhou University College of Public Health, Zhengzhou, China.
HaiYan YangZhengzhou University College of Public Health, Zhengzhou, China.
Yingjuan ZhengFirst Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xin LiBeijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guangcai DuanZhengzhou University College of Public Health, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhengzhou University · CNCapital Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) was discovered as a novel pathogen in the 2002-2003 SARS epidemic. The emergence and disappearance of this pathogen have brought questions regarding its source and evolution. Within the genome sequences of 281 SARS-CoVs, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and SARS-related CoVs (SARSr-CoVs), a ~430 bp genomic region (from 27 701 bp to 28 131 bp in AY390556.1) with regular variations was investigated. This ~430 bp region overlaps with the ORF8 gene and is prone to deletions and nucleotide substitutions. Its complexity suggested the need for a new genotyping method for coronaviruses related to SARS-similar coronaviruses (SARS-CoV, SARSr-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2). Bat SARSr-CoV presented 3 genotypes, of which type 0 is only seen in bat SARSr-CoV, type I is present in SARS in the early phase, and type II is found in all SARS-CoV-2. This genotyping also shows potential usage in distinguishing the SARS-similar coronaviruses from different hosts and geographic areas. This genomic region has important implications for predicting the epidemic trend and studying the evolution of coronavirus.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralAnimalsBase SequenceBetacoronavirusChiropteraEutheriaEvolution, MolecularGenes, ViralGenetic VariationHumansOpen Reading FramesPhylogenySARS-CoV-2Sequence AlignmentSequence DeletionSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirussars7a protein, SARS virusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral Matrix Proteinsgenotyping methodORF8 geneSARS-CoVSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32433742
PMCPMC7313917
OpenAlexW3025514478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.