ArticleJournal of vision2020
Differential aging effects in motion perception tasks for central and peripheral vision.
Article in Journal of vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceptual stabilization is weaker in older adults and correlates with spatial suppression of motion.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- A Novel Test of Dynamic Visual Function: Comparison Between Presbyopic and Non-Presbyopic Individuals.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Age-Related Differences in Perception of the Rotating Snakes Illusion Among Young and Older Adults with Normal Visual Acuity.Eye and brain · 2026Article
- Visual motion perception and driving hazard visibility at night-time.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A holistic adaptive ageing framework (HAAF) to address complex challenges in ageing.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2025Review
- Sensory profiles in older adults with orthopedic conditions during quiet stance: a cross-sectional study.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025Article
- Estimating the Impact of Aging on Visual Function Using Useful Field of View (UFOV) with a Focus on the Population of Gangwon-do in Korea.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Could driving help us to "see better"? A comparative assessment of saccadic efficiency, visual speed, and attention.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Age-Related Differences in the Perception of Robotic Referential Gaze in Human-Robot Interaction.International journal of social robotics · 2022Article
- The Effects of Glare on the Perception of Visual Motion as a Function of Age.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Visual Predictors of Postural Sway in Older Adults.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Motion perception as a risk factor for motor vehicle collision involvement in drivers ≥ 70 years.Accident; analysis and prevention · 2021Article
- Aging does not affect auditory motion discrimination based on interaural level differences.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The perception of motion is considered critical for performing everyday tasks, such as locomotion and driving, and relies on different levels of visual processing. However, it is unclear whether healthy aging differentially affects motion processing at specific levels of processing, or whether performance at central and peripheral spatial eccentricities is altered to the same extent. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of aging on hierarchically different components of motion processing: the minimum displacement of dots to perceive motion (Dmin), the minimum contrast and speed to determine the direction of motion, spatial surround suppression of motion, global motion coherence (translational and radial), and biological motion. We measured motion perception in both central vision and at 15° eccentricity, comparing performance in 20 older (60-79 years) and 20 younger (19-34 years) adults. Older adults had significantly elevated thresholds, relative to younger adults, for motion contrast, speed, Dmin, and biological motion. The differences between younger and older participants were of similar magnitude in central and peripheral vision, except for surround suppression of motion, which was weaker in central vision for the older group, but stronger in the periphery. Our findings demonstrate that the effects of aging are not uniform across all motion tasks. Whereas the performance of some tasks in the periphery can be predicted from the results in central vision, the effects of age on surround suppression of motion shows markedly different characteristics between central and peripheral vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.