Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32433720›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2020

Investigating tree and fruit growth through functional-structural modelling: implications of carbon autonomy at different scales.

Inigo Auzmendi, Jim S Hanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Optimizing daylily (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inigo AuzmendiCentre for Horticultural Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
Jim S HananCentre for Horticultural Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMany experimental studies assume that some topological units are autonomous with regard to carbon because it is convenient. Some plant models simulate carbon allocation, employing complex approaches that require calibration and fitted parameters. For whole-tree canopy simulations, simpler carbon allocation models can provide useful insights.

methodsWe propose a new method for simulating carbon allocation in the whole tree canopy considering various scales of carbon autonomy, i.e. branchlets, branches, limbs, and no autonomy. This method was implemented in a functional-structural plant model of growth of individual organs for studying macadamia tree growth during one growing season. KEY

resultsThis model allows the simulation of various scales of carbon autonomy in a simple tree canopy, showing organ within-tree variability according to the scale of autonomy. Using a real tree canopy, we observed differences in growth variability within the tree and in tree growth, with several scales of carbon autonomy. The simulations that assumed autonomy at branch scale, i.e. 2-year-old wood, showed the most realistic results.

conclusionsSimulations using this model were employed to investigate and explain aspects of differences in carbon autonomy between trees, organ growth variability, competition between shoot and fruit growth, and time of autonomy.

Indexed as

FruitTreesCarbonPlant LeavesWoodCarbonCarbon autonomyfruitgrowthleaf areamodellingtreeyield

Identifiers

PMID32433720
PMCPMC7489063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.