Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32433711›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2020

Discordant rearrangement of primary and anamnestic CD8+ T cell responses to influenza A viral epitopes upon exposure to bacterial superantigens: Implications for prophylactic vaccination, heterosubtypic immunity and superinfections.

Courtney E Meilleur, Arash Memarnejadian, Adil N Shivji, Jenna M Benoit, Stephen W Tuffs, Tina S Mele, Bhagirath Singh, Jimmy D Dikeakos, David J Topham, Hong-Hua Mu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In Vivo Cytotoxicity by α-GalCer-transactivated NK Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Courtney E MeilleurDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Arash MemarnejadianDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4005-8787
Adil N ShivjiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jenna M BenoitDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Stephen W TuffsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2874-7822
Tina S MeleDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6617-9790
Bhagirath SinghDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9792-8694
Jimmy D DikeakosDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
David J TophamDavid H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9435-8673
Hong-Hua MuDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Jack R BenninkViral Immunology Section, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
John K McCormickDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3742-7289
S M Mansour HaeryfarDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1125-8176
Western University · CANational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Virus Induction Of Primary CD8 T Cell ResponsesZIAAI000814 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI BENNINK, JACK R · 2009 to 2020
$6.8M
CIHR PJT – 156295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection with (SAg)-producing bacteria may precede or follow infection with or vaccination against influenza A viruses (IAVs). However, how SAgs alter the breadth of IAV-specific CD8+ T cell (TCD8) responses is unknown. Moreover, whether recall responses mediating heterosubtypic immunity to IAVs are manipulated by SAgs remains unexplored. We employed wild-type (WT) and mutant bacterial SAgs, SAg-sufficient/deficient Staphylococcus aureus strains, and WT, mouse-adapted and reassortant IAV strains in multiple in vivo settings to address the above questions. Contrary to the popular view that SAgs delete or anergize T cells, systemic administration of staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) or Mycoplasma arthritidis mitogen before intraperitoneal IAV immunization enlarged the clonal size of 'select' IAV-specific TCD8 and reshuffled the hierarchical pattern of primary TCD8 responses. This was mechanistically linked to the TCR Vβ makeup of the impacted clones rather than their immunodominance status. Importantly, SAg-expanded TCD8 retained their IFN-γ production and cognate cytolytic capacities. The enhancing effect of SEB on immunodominant TCD8 was also evident in primary responses to vaccination with heat-inactivated and live attenuated IAV strains administered intramuscularly and intranasally, respectively. Interestingly, in prime-boost immunization settings, the outcome of SEB administration depended strictly upon the time point at which this SAg was introduced. Accordingly, SEB injection before priming raised CD127highKLRG1low memory precursor frequencies and augmented the anamnestic responses of SEB-binding TCD8. By comparison, introducing SEB before boosting diminished recall responses to IAV-derived epitopes drastically and indiscriminately. This was accompanied by lower Ki67 and higher Fas, LAG-3 and PD-1 levels consistent with a pro-apoptotic and/or exhausted phenotype. Therefore, SAgs can have contrasting impacts on anti-IAV immunity depending on the naïve/memory status and the TCR composition of exposed TCD8. Finally, local administration of SEB or infection with SEB-producing S. aureus enhanced pulmonary TCD8 responses to IAV. Our findings have clear implications for superinfections and prophylactic vaccination.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopesFemaleHumansImmunologic MemoryInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanLymphocyte ActivationMiceMice, Inbred BALB CStaphylococcus aureusSuperantigensSuperinfectionVaccinationEpitopesSuperantigens

Identifiers

PMID32433711
PMCPMC7239382
OpenAlexW3026559828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.