Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32433704›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning.

Jack Brookes, Faisal Mushtaq, Earle Jamieson, Aaron J Fath, Geoffrey Bingham, Peter Culmer, Richard M Wilkie, Mark Mon-Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jack BrookesSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4600-7561
Faisal MushtaqSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom.
Earle JamiesonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom.
Aaron J FathDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
Geoffrey BinghamDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
Peter CulmerSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom.
Richard M WilkieSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom.
Mark Mon-WilliamsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disturbance forces facilitate motor learning, but theoretical explanations for this counterintuitive phenomenon are lacking. Smooth arm movements require predictions (inference) about the force-field associated with a workspace. The Free Energy Principle (FEP) suggests that such 'active inference' is driven by 'surprise'. We used these insights to create a formal model that explains why disturbance might help learning. In two experiments, participants undertook a continuous tracking task where they learned how to move their arm in different directions through a novel 3D force field. We compared baseline performance before and after exposure to the novel field to quantify learning. In Experiment 1, the exposure phases (but not the baseline measures) were delivered under three different conditions: (i) robot haptic assistance; (ii) no guidance; (iii) robot haptic disturbance. The disturbance group showed the best learning as our model predicted. Experiment 2 further tested our FEP inspired model. Assistive and/or disturbance forces were applied as a function of performance (low surprise), and compared to a random error manipulation (high surprise). The random group showed the most improvement as predicted by the model. Thus, motor learning can be conceptualised as a process of entropy reduction. Short term motor strategies (e.g. global impedance) can mitigate unexpected perturbations, but continuous movements require active inference about external force-fields in order to create accurate internal models of the external world (motor learning). Our findings reconcile research on the relationship between noise, variability, and motor learning, and show that information is the currency of motor learning.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalLearningMovementPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32433704
PMCPMC7239483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.