Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32433626›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2020

Assessing motor-related phenotypes of Caenorhabditis elegans with the wide field-of-view nematode tracking platform.

Mandy Koopman, Quentin Peter, Renée I Seinstra, Michele Perni, Michele Vendruscolo, Christopher M Dobson, Tuomas P J Knowles, Ellen A A Nollen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nematicidal Effects and Cytotoxicity of Levamisole onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mandy KoopmanEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. m.koopman@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1429-2078
Quentin PeterCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8018-3059
Renée I SeinstraEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Michele PerniCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Michele VendruscoloCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3616-1610
Christopher M DobsonCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tuomas P J KnowlesCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-0140
Ellen A A NollenEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. e.a.a.nollen@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-6373
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans is a valuable model organism in biomedical research that has led to major discoveries in the fields of neurodegeneration, cancer and aging. Because movement phenotypes are commonly used and represent strong indicators of C. elegans fitness, there is an increasing need to replace manual assessments of worm motility with automated measurements to increase throughput and minimize observer biases. Here, we provide a protocol for the implementation of the improved wide field-of-view nematode tracking platform (WF-NTP), which enables the simultaneous analysis of hundreds of worms with respect to multiple behavioral parameters. The protocol takes only a few hours to complete, excluding the time spent culturing C. elegans, and includes (i) experimental design and preparation of samples, (ii) data recording, (iii) software management with appropriate parameter choices and (iv) post-experimental data analysis. We compare the WF-NTP with other existing worm trackers, including those having high spatial resolution. The main benefits of WF-NTP relate to the high number of worms that can be assessed at the same time on a whole-plate basis and the number of phenotypes that can be screened for simultaneously.

Indexed as

MovementPhenotypeAnimalsBiological AssayCaenorhabditis elegans

Identifiers

PMID32433626
OpenAlexW2996473093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.