Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32433602›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2020

Fatal prostate cancer incidence trends in the United States and England by race, stage, and treatment.

Eboneé N Butler, Scott P Kelly, Victoria H Coupland, Philip S Rosenberg, Michael B Cook

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eboneé N ButlerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 20892, Bethesda, MD, USA. ebonee.butler@nih.gov.
Scott P KellyDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 20892, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Victoria H CouplandNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Wellington House, SE1 8UG, London, UK.
Philip S RosenbergDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 20892, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Michael B CookDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 20892, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNational Cancer Registration Service · GB

Funding

Descriptive Studies and Record LinkageZIACP010183 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SHIELS, MEREDITH · 2009 to 2025
$10.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferential uptake of prostate-specific antigen testing in the US and UK has been linked to between-country differences for prostate cancer incidence. We examined stage-specific fatal prostate cancer incidence trends in the US and England, by treatment and race/ethnicity.

methodsUsing data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and Public Health England's National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, we identified prostate cancer patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2005, aged 45-84 years. Fatal prostate cancer was defined as death attributed to the disease within 10 years of diagnosis. We used age-period-cohort models to assess trends in fatal prostate cancer incidence.

resultsFatal prostate cancer incidence declined in the US by -7.5% each year and increased in England by 7.7% annually. These trends were primarily driven by locoregional disease in the US and distant disease in England. Black men in both countries had twofold to threefold higher fatal prostate cancer incidence rates, when compared with their white counterparts; however, receipt of radical prostatectomy lessened this disparity.

conclusionsWe report a significant increasing rate of fatal prostate cancer incidence among English men. The black-white racial disparity appears pervasive but is attenuated among those who received radical prostatectomy in the US.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleEnglandHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRegistriesUnited StatesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID32433602
PMCPMC7403310
OpenAlexW3026042557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.