Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32433501›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Applying Machine Learning to Kinematic and Eye Movement Features of a Movement Imitation Task to Predict Autism Diagnosis.

Andrius Vabalas, Emma Gowen, Ellen Poliakoff, Alexander J Casson

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Effective Autism Classification Through Grasping Kinematics.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Computational Measurement of Motor Imitation and Imitative Learning Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Computational Motor Imitation Measurement in ASD.ICMI '21 companion : companion publication of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction : October 18th-22, 2021, Montreal, Canada. ICMI (Conference) (23rd : 2021 : Montreal, Quebec; Online) · 2021
    Article
  20. Machine learning models improve prediction of large vessel occlusion and mechanical thrombectomy candidacy in acute ischemic stroke.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrius VabalasThe University of Manchester, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Manchester, United Kingdom. andrius.vabalas@manchester.ac.uk.
Emma GowenThe University of Manchester, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ellen PoliakoffThe University of Manchester, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Alexander J CassonThe University of Manchester, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Manchester, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism is a developmental condition currently identified by experts using observation, interview, and questionnaire techniques and primarily assessing social and communication deficits. Motor function and movement imitation are also altered in autism and can be measured more objectively. In this study, motion and eye tracking data from a movement imitation task were combined with supervised machine learning methods to classify 22 autistic and 22 non-autistic adults. The focus was on a reliable machine learning application. We have used nested validation to develop models and further tested the models with an independent data sample. Feature selection was aimed at selection stability to assure result interpretability. Our models predicted diagnosis with 73% accuracy from kinematic features, 70% accuracy from eye movement features and 78% accuracy from combined features. We further explored features which were most important for predictions to better understand movement imitation differences in autism. Consistent with the behavioural results, most discriminative features were from the experimental condition in which non-autistic individuals tended to successfully imitate unusual movement kinematics while autistic individuals tended to fail. Machine learning results show promise that future work could aid in the diagnosis process by providing quantitative tests to supplement current qualitative ones.

Indexed as

Eye Movement MeasurementsSupervised Machine LearningAdultAutistic DisorderEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID32433501
PMCPMC7239902
OpenAlexW3027342555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.