Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32433262›Full record

ArticleMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2020

Baseline estrogen levels in postmenopausal women participating in the MAP.3 breast cancer chemoprevention trial.

Harriet Richardson, Vikki Ho, Romain Pasquet, Ravinder J Singh, Matthew P Goetz, Dongsheng Tu, Paul E Goss, James N Ingle, MAP.3 Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Targeting Oestrogen Receptor Signalling in Breast Cancer Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Harriet RichardsonDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Vikki HoCentre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Romain PasquetCentre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Ravinder J SinghDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Matthew P GoetzDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Dongsheng TuDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Paul E GossHarvard Medical School, MGH Cancer Centre, Boston, MA.
James N IngleDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
MAP.3 Investigators

Funding

The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to quantify baseline estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) concentrations according to selected patient characteristics in a substudy nested within the MAP.3 chemoprevention trial.

methodsE2 and E1 levels were measured in 4,068 postmenopausal women using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Distributions were described by age, years since menopause, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and use and duration of hormone therapy using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariable linear regression was also used to identify characteristics associated with estrogen levels.

resultsAfter truncation at the 97.5th percentile, the mean (SD)/median (IQR) values for E2 and E1 were 5.41 (4.67)/4.0 (2.4-6.7) pg/mL and 24.7 (14.1)/21 (15-31) pg/mL, respectively. E2 and E1 were strongly correlated (Pearson correlation [r] = 0.8, P < 0.01). The largest variation in E2 and E1 levels was by BMI; mean E2 and E1 levels were 3.5 and 19.1 pg/mL, respectively for women with BMI less than 25 and 7.5 and 30.6 pg/mL, respectively, for women with BMI greater than 30. E2 and E1 varied by age, BMI, smoking status, and prior hormone therapy in multivariable models (P < 0.01).

conclusionsThere was large interindividual variability observed for E2 and E1 that varied significantly by participant characteristics, but with small absolute differences except in the case of BMI. Although the majority of participant characteristics were independently associated with E1 and E2, together, these factors only explained about 20% of the variation in E1 and E2 levels.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChemopreventionEstradiolEstrogensEstroneFemaleHumansPostmenopauseEstradiolEstrogensEstrone

Identifiers

PMID32433262
PMCPMC7469568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.