Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32433033›Full record

ArticleIET nanobiotechnology2020

Antibacterial activity of SPIONs versus ferrous and ferric ions under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: a preliminary mechanism study.

Ahmad Gholami, Fatemeh Mohammadi, Younes Ghasemi, Navid Omidifar, Alireza Ebrahiminezhad

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET nanobiotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Antimicrobial activity of metal-based nanoparticles: a mini-review.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Salvianolic acid A alleviates HScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metal Nanoparticles to CombatMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. TiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A Review on Health Benefits ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmad GholamiPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz P.O. box 71348-14336, Iran.
Fatemeh MohammadiDepartment of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Younes GhasemiSchool of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Navid OmidifarDepartment of Pathology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Alireza EbrahiminezhadBiotechnology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 71348-14336, Iran. a.ebrahiminezhad@yahoo.com.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern medicine, major attention has been paid to superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs). Recent studies have shown the antibacterial properties of SPIONs against some Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains. These nanoparticles (NPs) can bind to bacterial membranes via hydrophobic or electrostatic interactions and pass through cell barriers. In this study, the authors evaluated the antibacterial activity of magnetic NPs in comparison with ferrous and ferric ions. The level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the treated Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteria were directly measured by fluorometric detection. The results showed that iron ions and SPIONs had significant dependent antimicrobial activities. SPIONs showed greater inhibitory effects than ferrous and ferric ions against the growth of treated bacterial strains under anaerobic conditions, while in aerobic conditions, ferrous showed the strongest antibacterial activity. In anaerobic conditions, they observed the greatest ROS formation and lowest minimum inhibitory concentration in the SPION-treated group in comparison with the other groups. It seems that the release of iron ions from SPIONs and subsequent activation of ROS pathway are the main antibacterial mechanisms of action. Nevertheless, the greater antibacterial effect of SPIONs in anaerobic conditions represents other mechanisms involved in the antibacterial activity of these NPs.

Indexed as

AerobiosisAnaerobiosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coliIronMagnetite NanoparticlesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReactive Oxygen SpeciesAnti-Bacterial AgentsIronMagnetite NanoparticlesReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID32433033
PMCPMC8676445
OpenAlexW2993907712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.