ArticleSLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D2020
Deep Learning-Based HCS Image Analysis for the Enterprise.
Article in SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Data stewardship and curation practices in AI-based genomics and automated microscopy image analysis for high-throughput screening studies: promoting robust and ethical AI applications.Human genomics · 2025Review
- VONet: A deep learning network for 3D reconstruction of organoid structures with a minimal number of confocal images.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- A Decade in a Systematic Review: The Evolution and Impact of Cell Painting.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- From pixels to phenotypes: Integrating image-based profiling with cell health data as BioMorph features improves interpretability.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence unifies knowledge and actions in drug repositioning.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2021Review
- High Content Analysis Across Signaling Modulation Treatments for Subcellular Target Identification Reveals Heterogeneity in Cellular Response.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug discovery programs are moving increasingly toward phenotypic imaging assays to model disease-relevant pathways and phenotypes in vitro. These assays offer richer information than target-optimized assays by investigating multiple cellular pathways simultaneously and producing multiplexed readouts. However, extracting the desired information from complex image data poses significant challenges, preventing broad adoption of more sophisticated phenotypic assays. Deep learning-based image analysis can address these challenges by reducing the effort required to analyze large volumes of complex image data at a quality and speed adequate for routine phenotypic screening in pharmaceutical research. However, while general purpose deep learning frameworks are readily available, they are not readily applicable to images from automated microscopy. During the past 3 years, we have optimized deep learning networks for this type of data and validated the approach across diverse assays with several industry partners. From this work, we have extracted five essential design principles that we believe should guide deep learning-based analysis of high-content images and multiparameter data: (1) insightful data representation, (2) automation of training, (3) multilevel quality control, (4) knowledge embedding and transfer to new assays, and (5) enterprise integration. We report a new deep learning-based software that embodies these principles, Genedata Imagence, which allows screening scientists to reliably detect stable endpoints for primary drug response, assess toxicity and safety-relevant effects, and discover new phenotypes and compound classes. Furthermore, we show how the software retains expert knowledge from its training on a particular assay and successfully reapplies it to different, novel assays in an automated fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.