Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32432952›Full record

ArticleSLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D2020

Deep Learning-Based HCS Image Analysis for the Enterprise.

Stephan Steigele, Daniel Siegismund, Matthias Fassler, Marusa Kustec, Bernd Kappler, Tom Hasaka, Ada Yee, Annette Brodte, Stephan Heyse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephan SteigeleGenedata AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel SiegismundGenedata AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Matthias FasslerGenedata AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Marusa KustecGenedata AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Bernd KapplerGenedata AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Tom HasakaGenedata Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
Ada YeeGenedata AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Annette BrodteGenedata AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Stephan HeyseGenedata AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery programs are moving increasingly toward phenotypic imaging assays to model disease-relevant pathways and phenotypes in vitro. These assays offer richer information than target-optimized assays by investigating multiple cellular pathways simultaneously and producing multiplexed readouts. However, extracting the desired information from complex image data poses significant challenges, preventing broad adoption of more sophisticated phenotypic assays. Deep learning-based image analysis can address these challenges by reducing the effort required to analyze large volumes of complex image data at a quality and speed adequate for routine phenotypic screening in pharmaceutical research. However, while general purpose deep learning frameworks are readily available, they are not readily applicable to images from automated microscopy. During the past 3 years, we have optimized deep learning networks for this type of data and validated the approach across diverse assays with several industry partners. From this work, we have extracted five essential design principles that we believe should guide deep learning-based analysis of high-content images and multiparameter data: (1) insightful data representation, (2) automation of training, (3) multilevel quality control, (4) knowledge embedding and transfer to new assays, and (5) enterprise integration. We report a new deep learning-based software that embodies these principles, Genedata Imagence, which allows screening scientists to reliably detect stable endpoints for primary drug response, assess toxicity and safety-relevant effects, and discover new phenotypes and compound classes. Furthermore, we show how the software retains expert knowledge from its training on a particular assay and successfully reapplies it to different, novel assays in an automated fashion.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysMolecular ImagingAutomationDeep LearningDrug DiscoveryHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopySignal TransductionSoftwarecell-based assayshigh-content screeningimage analysisimaging technologiesphenotypic drug discovery

Identifiers

PMID32432952
PMCPMC7372584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.