Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32432711›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Assessment of a Prediction Model for Antidepressant Treatment Stability Using Supervised Topic Models.

Michael C Hughes, Melanie F Pradier, Andrew Slavin Ross, Thomas H McCoy, Roy H Perlis, Finale Doshi-Velez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Electronic health records and stratified psychiatry: bridge to precision treatment?Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Machine Learning in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2023
    Review
  10. The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Preferential Mixture-of-Experts: Interpretable Models that Rely on Human Expertise As Much As Possible.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael C HughesDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts.
Melanie F PradierJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Andrew Slavin RossJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Thomas H McCoyCenter for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Roy H PerlisCenter for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Finale Doshi-VelezJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Funding

Natural language processing for characterizing psychopathologyR01MH106577 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PERLIS, ROY H. · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
Machine learning for data-driven subtyping of major depressionR56MH115187 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PERLIS, ROY H. · 2018 to 2018
$596k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106577NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH115187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In the absence of readily assessed and clinically validated predictors of treatment response, pharmacologic management of major depressive disorder often relies on trial and error. Objective: To assess a model using electronic health records to identify predictors of treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included data from 81 630 adults with a coded diagnosis of major depressive disorder from 2 academic medical centers in Boston, Massachusetts, including outpatient primary and specialty care clinics from December 1, 1997, to December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2018, to March 15, 2020. Exposures: Treatment with at least 1 of 11 standard antidepressants. Main Outcomes and Measures: Stable treatment response, intended as a proxy for treatment effectiveness, defined as continued prescription of an antidepressant for 90 days. Supervised topic models were used to extract 10 interpretable covariates from coded clinical data for stability prediction. With use of data from 1 hospital system (site A), generalized linear models and ensembles of decision trees were trained to predict stability outcomes from topic features that summarize patient history. Held-out patients from site A and individuals from a second hospital system (site B) were evaluated. Results: Among the 81 630 adults (56 340 women [69%]; mean [SD] age, 48.46 [14.75] years; range, 18.0-80.0 years), 55 303 reached a stable response to their treatment regimen during follow-up. For held-out patients from site A, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discrimination of the general stability outcome was 0.627 (95% CI, 0.615-0.639) for the supervised topic model with 10 covariates. In evaluation of site B, the AUC was 0.619 (95% CI, 0.610-0.627). Building models to predict stability specific to a particular drug did not improve prediction of general stability even when using a harder-to-interpret ensemble classifier and 9256 coded covariates (specific AUC, 0.647; 95% CI, 0.635-0.658; general AUC, 0.661; 95% CI, 0.648-0.672). Topics coherently captured clinical concepts associated with treatment response. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that coded clinical data available in electronic health records may facilitate prediction of general treatment response but not response to specific medications. Although greater discrimination is likely required for clinical application, the results provide a transparent baseline for such studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntidepressive AgentsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID32432711
PMCPMC7240354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.