ArticleJAMA network open2020
Association of Pharmacist Prescription With Dispensed Duration of Hormonal Contraception.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Preexisting Diabetes and Pregnancy: An Endocrine Society and European Society of Endocrinology Joint Clinical Practice Guideline.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Guideline
- From Authorization to Access: A Synthesis of Implementation Barriers and Strategies for Pharmacist-Prescribed Contraception.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
- Long-acting reversible contraception and medication abortion: a national descriptive survey of Australian community pharmacist knowledge, attitudes and practices.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Adolescents' and Young Adults' Receipt of Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Association between combined oral contraceptive prescription and cervical artery dissection: A retrospective cohort study.Thrombosis research · 2025Article
- Investigating the complexity of naloxone distribution: Which policies matter for pharmacies and potential recipients.Journal of health economics · 2024Article
- A stakeholder-developed logic model to improve utilization of pharmacy-prescribed contraception in Utah.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Article
- North Carolina Pharmacists' Support for Hormonal Contraception Prescription Status Change.Journal of pharmacy practice · 2023Article
- Women's health, hormonal balance, and personal autonomy.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Male contraception is coming: Who do men want to prescribe their birth control?Contraception · 2022Article
- Availability of Pharmacist-Prescribed Contraception in Hawai'i.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2022Article
- Sexual and reproductive health services provided by community pharmacists: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Minnesota Policy on Pharmacist-Prescribed Contraceptives: Benefits, Limitations, and Opportunities for Improvement.Innovations in pharmacy · 2021Article
- Opposition to Pharmacist Contraception Services: Evidence for Rebuttal.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Long-Lasting, Patient-Controlled, Procedure-Free Contraception: A Review of Annovera with a Pharmacist Perspective.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Enhancing access to contraception through pharmacist prescribing across Canada.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
- Access to contraception in pharmacies during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Since 2016, 11 states have expanded the scope of pharmacists to include direct prescription of hormonal contraception. Dispensing greater than 1 month's supply is associated with improved contraceptive continuation rates and fewer breaks in coverage. Scant data exist on the practice of pharmacist prescription of contraception and its outcomes compared with traditional, clinic-based prescriptions. Objective: To compare the amount of hormonal contraceptive supply dispensed between pharmacists and clinic-based prescriptions. Prescribing patterns were assessed by describing prescribing practices for women with contraindications to combined hormonal contraception. Characteristics of women seeking hormonal contraception directly from pharmacists were also described. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study surveyed women aged 18 to 50 years who presented to pharmacies in California, Colorado, Hawaii, and Oregon for hormonal contraception prescribed by a clinician or a pharmacist between January 30 and November 1, 2019. Exposures: Pharmacist or clinic-based prescription of contraception. Main Outcomes and Measures: Months of contraceptive supply dispensed. Results: Four hundred ten women (mean [SD] age, 27.1 [7.7] years) were recruited who obtained contraception directly from a pharmacist (n = 144) or by traditional clinician prescription (n = 266). Women obtaining contraception from a pharmacist were significantly younger (82 [56.9%] vs 115 [43.2%] participants aged 18-24 years; P = .03), had less education (38 [26.4%] vs 100 [37.6%] with a bachelor degree; P = .002), and were more likely to be uninsured (16 [11.1%] vs 8 [3.0%] participants; P = .001) compared with women with a prescription from a clinician. Pharmacists were significantly more likely to prescribe a 6-month or greater supply of contraceptives than clinicians (6.9% vs 1.5%, P < .001) and significantly less likely to only prescribe a 1-month supply (42 [29.2%] vs 118 [44.4%] prescriptions; P < .001). Controlling for all covariates, women seen by pharmacists had higher odds of receipt of a 6-month or greater supply of contraceptives compared with those seen by clinicians (odds ratio = 3.55; 95% CI, 1.88-6.70). Pharmacists were as likely as clinicians to prescribe a progestin-only method to women with a potential contraindication to estrogen (n = 60 women; 8 [20.0%] vs 6 [30.0%], P = .52). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that pharmacist prescription of contraception may be associated with improved contraceptive continuation by preventing breaks in coverage through the provision of a greater supply of medication. Efforts are needed to educate prescribing providers on the importance of dispensing 6 months or greater contraceptive supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.